Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Tata Consumer Products Limited vs Ecgc Limited on 15 November, 2021

Author: N. J. Jamadar

Bench: N. J. Jamadar

                                                      10-IAL16229-21INCOMSS2030-1996.DOC

                                                                                   Santosh
                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION


                                INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 16229 OF 2021
                                                  IN
                                  COMM SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2030 OF 1996

                      Tata Consumer Products Limited                       ...Applicant/
                                                                                Plaintiff
                                             Versus
SANTOSH               ECGC Limited                                         ...Defendant
SUBHASH
KULKARNI
Digitally signed by   Mr. Karl Tamboly, a/w Mr. Arun Siwach, Ms. Priyanka Mitra,
SANTOSH SUBHASH
KULKARNI
Date: 2021.11.16
                          Ms. Kavya Mathur, i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangalda, for
                          the Plaintiff/Applicant.
10:36:41 +0530



                      Ms. Sanaya Dadachanji, a/w Mr. Advait Raorane, i/b Manilal
                          Kher Ambalal & Co., for the Defendant.

                                                CORAM:       N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                                                DATED :      15th NOVEMBER, 2021
                      PC:-

1. Heard the learned Counsels for the parties.

2. Mr. Tamboly, the learned Counsel for the plaintiff - applicant submits that Mr. Jose George, the learned Advocate, who was appointed as a Court Commissioner to record the cross-examination of PW-1 Mr. Amitava Ranjan Sen, has made a request to relieve him from the commission on account of personal difficulty.

3. Time to complete cross-examination granted by this Court has also expired.

1/2

10-IAL16229-21INCOMSS2030-1996.DOC

4. In view of the above, the learned Counsels for the parties make a joint statement that they have no objection to relieve Mr. Jose George as a Court Commissioner and instead appoint Mr. Swanand Ganoo, as the Court Commissioner to record further cross-examination, on the same terms on which Mr. George was appointed, by order dated 5th February, 2020.

5. Mr. Ganoo, the learned Counsel is requested to complete the cross-examination of PW-1 through Video Conferencing in terms of the order dated 2nd August, 2021, within a period of ten weeks from today.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2