Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Arjun Mall Retail Holdings Pvt. Ltd. vs Gunocean Inc on 17 March, 2021

Bench: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant, Aniruddha Bose

     SLP(C)No.4357/21                              1

     ITEM NO.3               Court 2 (Video Conferencing)            SECTION XIV

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).4357/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-02-2021
     in FAO (COMM) No.31/2021 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New
     Delhi)

     ARJUN MALL RETAIL HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. & ORS.                     Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

     M/s GUNOCEAN INC                                                Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.37409/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

     Date : 17-03-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

     For Petitioner(s)             Mr.   S. Wasim A.Qadri, Sr.Adv.
                                   Mr.   Tamim Qadri, Adv.
                                   Mr.   Saeed Qadri, Adv.
                                   Mr.   Udita Singh, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. This petition is directed against an interim order dated 10.02.2021 passed by the Delhi High Court in FAO (Comm)No.31 of 2021 whereby the petitioner was directed to deposit certain amounts to stay the execution of the impugned award.

Having heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and carefully perusing the material placed on record, we see no Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV reason to interfere with the impugned interim order passed by the Date: 2021.03.17 16:53:38 IST Reason: High Court.

The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

……….2/-

SLP(C)No.4357/21 2

As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.

However, at the request of learned senior counsel for the petitioners, we extend the time to deposit the amount, as directed by the High Court, by a further period of four weeks from today.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV)                                              (BEENA JOLLY)
  DEPUTY REGISTRAR                                                COURT MASTER