Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Thanuja.P.A vs State Of Kerala on 25 January, 2017

Author: A.Hariprasad

Bench: A.Hariprasad

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                               PRESENT:

                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

             WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/12TH ASWINA, 1939

                                   WP(C).No. 25283 of 2017 (I)
                                  ------------------------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
----------------------

          THANUJA.P.A., W/O.K.PADMANABHAN
          DREAM VILLA, DARMASALA, KANNUR-670 562.

                     BY ADVS.DR.K.P.PRADEEP
                              SRI.SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN
                              SRI.T.T.BIJU
                              SRI.K.P.KESAVAN NAIR
                              SMT.T.THASMI

RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------

        1. STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
          HOME DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.

        2. DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, KANNUR
           KERALA POLICE, CIVIL STATION ROAD,
           KANNUR -670 002.

        3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
           TALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION, TALIPARAMBA
          KANNUR - 670 034.

        4. BRANCH MANAGER, AXIS BANK
           URVA BRANCH, MANGALORE,
           KARNATAKA -575 010.

        5. BRANCH MANAGER, SYNDICATE BANK
          MANGATTUPARAMBA BRANCH,
           KANNUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS P.O,
          KANNUR -670 567.

                     R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.PAULOCHAN ANTONY
                     R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.REKHA C NAIR
                     R5 BY SRI.R.S. KALKURA, SC, SYNDICATE BANK

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
           04-10-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


AD

WP(C).No. 25283 of 2017 (I)
----------------------------------------

                                               APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
---------------------------------------
EXHIBIT P1          TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 25.1.2017 RECEIVED FROM EMAIL ID
                     [email protected].

EXHIBIT P2          TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25.4.2017 SUBMITTED TO THE 5TH
                     RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3          TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. 4234/NEFT/4234.220. 47764
                     DATED 26.4.2017 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH
                     RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4          TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD
                     RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5          TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 26.4.2017 ISSUED BY
                     THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6          TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. AXISB/783/URVA/17-18/01
                     DATED 6.5.2017 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 5TH
                     RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
---------------------------------------------


                                                   NIL




                                                        //TRUE COPY//


                                                        P..A TO JUDGE




AD



                          A.HARIPRASAD, J
                 ---------------------------------------
                    WP(C). No.25283 of 2017
                 ----------------------------------------
             Dated this the 4th day of October, 2017



                              JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction to the 3rd respondent to take further actions in Ext.P4 petition file before him, in accordance with law and to proceed with the matter under Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code to seize the amount involved in Ext.P5, at the earliest, or in alternative.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction to the 4th respondent to reverse the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- remitted from the account of the petitioner in 5th respondent bank, as requested by the 5th respondent in Ext.3 communication.
iii. Direct the respondents to pay cost of this proceedings iv. Grant any other relief, in the interest of justice, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.
WP(C). No.25283 of 2017 2

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the 4th respondent.

3. The petitioner is a native of Taliparamba in Kannur district. On 25.04.2017, she received an email from the account of her brother Sri.Vinoj, who works abroad. She was asked to transfer funds for the purpose of his wife's treatment. The -mail was followed by another email with details of the bank account to which the fund was to be transferred. Ext.P1 is the copy of the email received by the petitioner.

4. As instructed in the email, she transferred Rs.1 lakh to the account referred to in Ext.P1 mail. The amount was transferred from her account with the 5th respondent bank to the account of the transferee in the 4th respondent bank.

5. Later, on enquiry, it was revealed that the email received by the petitioner was a fake mail. Email account of her brother had been hacked by someone. Immediately, the petitioner informed the 5th respondent bank and notified the 4th respondent bank to suspend the transferee's account. Ext.P2 is WP(C). No.25283 of 2017 3 the letter issued in that regard.

6. According to the request made by the petitioner, the 5th respondent bank issued a letter to the 4th respondent bank asking them to reverse the amount back to the petitioner's account. Ext.P3 is the copy of the letter issued by the 5th respondent to the 4th respondent bank. Simultaneously the petitioner filed a complaint before the police requesting them to take legal action against the offender, who hacked the email of her brother. According to her, this is an offence falling within the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000.

7. The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that Taliparamba police has registered the crime No.1088/2017 under Sections 420, 66, 66(c) and 66(d) of IT Act, 2000.

8. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the following directions are issued.

i. The 4th respondent bank shall reverse the amount of Rs.1 lakh to the account of the petitioner in the 5th respondent bank as requested in Ext.P3 within 15 days from today on getting a WP(C). No.25283 of 2017 4 request from the petitioner in that regard.

ii. The 3rd respondent is directed to proceed with the investigation and if he finds that it should be investigated by the Cyber cell of the Kerala Police having jurisdictions, it shall be transferred to the officer of appropriate rank within a week.

With these observations, the above writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

A.HARIPRASAD JUDGE AD/04/10/17