Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

K.Dhushyanthan vs Saju D on 25 August, 2014

Author: P.R. Ramachandra Menon

Bench: P.R.Ramachandra Menon

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                 PRESENT:

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

                MONDAY,THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/2ND CHAITHRA, 1937

                                  Con.Case(C).No. 109 of 2015 (S)
                              -----------------------------------------------------
              AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27875/2013 DATED 25-08-2014
                                               -------------------

PETITIONER(S) :
--------------------------

        1. K.DHUSHYANTHAN, AGED 64 YEARS
            S/O. KUNJACHAN, PUTHEN PARAMBIL, PERUMPALLI
            VALIYAZHEEKKAL P.O., (VIA) KANDALLOOR
            KAYAMKULAM.
            (RETIRED SANITATION CONTINGENT WORKER
            MAVELIKARA MUNICIPALITY)

        2. M. AHAMMEDKUNJU, AGED 64 YEARS
            S/O. MOITHEENKUNJU, ABDULLA MANZIL, KADUVINAL
            P.O. VALLIKUNNAM, ALAPPUZHA
            (RETIRED SANITATION CONTINGENT WORKER,
            MAVELIKARA MUNICIPALITY).

        3. M.T. KESAVAN, AGED 64 YEARS
            S/O. T. EVAN, MELETHOYIKKOTTU, KOZHUVALLUR P.O.
            CHENGANNUR TALUK.
            (RETIRED SANITATION CONTINGENT WORKER
            MAVELIKARA MUNICIPALITY).

        4. P.J.JEROME, AGED 63 YEARS
            S/O. JOSEPH, VETTIYIDATHPARAMBIL, KOTTARAKAVU
            MAVELIKARA P.O.
            (RETIRED SANITATION CONTINGENT WORKER,
            MAVELIKARA MUNICIPALITY).

        5. E.SUHARBAN, AGED 62 YEARS
            W/O. ALIYARKUNJU, VANIYAPURAKKAL, PURAKKAD P.O.
            ALAPPUZHA
            (RETIRED SANITATION CONTINGENT WORKER
            MAVELIKARA MUNICIPALITY)




                                                                                       ...2/-

Con.Case(C).No. 109 of 2015 (S)            -2-




        6. A.ABDUL BASHEER,
            AGED 62 YEARS, S/O P.K. ALI,
             ANAAN ANISH MANZIL, BALABHAVAN ROAD
             M.O. WARD, ALAPPUZHA.
             (RETIRED SANITATION CONTINGENT WORKER,
             MAVELIKARA MUNICIPALITY).

            BY ADVS.SRI.K.SASIKUMAR
                        SRI.S.ARAVIND
                        SRI.R.ROHITH
                        SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY
                        SRI.MATHEW JOHN PUTHUPARAMPIL

RESPONDENT :
------------------------

            SAJU D.,
            (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS)
            SECRETARY, MAVELIKARA MUNICIPALITY,
            MAVELIKARA-690101.

            BY ADV. SRI.RASHEED C., SC

            THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
            ADMISSION ON 23-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:




Mn


                                                                         ...3/-

Con.Case(C).No. 109 of 2015 (S)




                                 APPENDIX


PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :


ANNEXURE A1       : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 27875 OF 2013 OF THE
                    HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 25-8-2014.




RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL




                                                            //TRUE COPY//




                                                            P.S. TO JUDGE
Mn



                  P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
            ..............................................................................
       CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (C)No. 109 OF 2015
                                                IN
                      W.P.(C)No.27875 OF 2013
             .........................................................................
                     Dated this the 23rd March, 2015

                                  J U D G M E N T

The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the direction has been complied with and a cheque for the due amount has already been handed over to the petitioner. The said version is not rebutted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

In the above circumstance, this Court does not find it necessary to proceed with further steps. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court case is closed.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE lk