Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

M/S Swastik Builders And Developers ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 July, 2025

                            HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH; BENCH AT INDORE

                             MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 1001 TO 1018
          Indore, dated 07.07.2025
                 The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate passing of
          identical conditional order in these matters involving similar office objection/default.
                          In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within the
          prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the Registrar in
          the     first     instance.       The    Registrar    granted    sufficient     time    to   the
          petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office objection, however, due to
          non-removal of office objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter
          was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted further time, by
          passing common order on the earlier occasion.
                          In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules, second by the
          Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/ applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure
          the office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in
          terms     of      this   order,   SIX    WEEKS'      further    time     is   granted   to   the
          petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office
          objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that time, failing
          which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
          without further reference to the Court.
                          Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is about non-
          service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the concerned

matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing /scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

Sr. No.1001 to 1018 Returnable Date - 22.08.2025 (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE sourabh