Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bangalore District Court

The State Rep. By vs A-1 : Aska Kouser on 20 January, 2016

           IN THE COURT OF THE VI ADDL. CHIEF
          METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE BANGALORE CITY

           DATED THIS THE   20th JANUARY 2016

          PRESENT :Smt. M. LATHAKUMARI
                              M.A.,LL.M.
                   VI ADDL. C.M.M., BANGALORE.


     JUDGMENT UNDER SECTION 355 OF Cr.P.C.

Case No.            : CC.No.1114/2016

Date of offence     : 21.11.2014

Complainant         : The State rep. by
                       PSI of Micolayout PS

Accused             :   A-1 : Aska Kouser
                        S/o.Rafeeq Pasha, No. 15,
                        16th Cross, 8th Main, Ayub
                        Hotel nearby, old
                        Gurappanapalya, Bangalore.

                        A-2: Firoz S/o.Syed Ahamed
                        John, No. 43, 2nd main road,
                        Jandagalli, New
                        Gurappanapalay, Bangalore.

                        A-3: Afroz Pasha S/o.Syed
                        Ahamed John, No. 43, 2nd
                        main road, Jandagalli, New
                        Gurappanapalay, Bangalore.


Offence             : U/s.323,324 r/w. 34
                      of IPC
                                2




Plea                    : Accused No.1 to 3 pleaded
                           guilty

Final order             : Accused No.1 to 3 are
                           Convicted

Date of Order           : 20.01.2016.
                          ** ** **



       BRIEF STATEMENT OF         REASONS FOR DECISION


       Complainant-police have filed this                 charge

sheet against accused no.1 to 3                alleging that

accused no.1 to 3 are picked up quarrel with CW-

1     and assaulted CW-1 with Glass piece and rod

and     thereby    committed       the    offences   referred

supra.      Accused submitted that, accused no.1 to

3     are   pleaded     guilty.     I    am   satisfied    that

accused by knowing the consequences of pleading

guilty      of    the   alleged     offences,     they     were

pleaded guilty voluntarily without any pressure

from any authorities and also CW-1 is sister in

law of Accused No.1.
                                3




       2. Heard accused with regard to sentence

of the accused no.1 to 3.               Accused No.1 to 3

submits that they were the only bread earner in

their family     and hence pray for their acquittal

by   imposing   nominal      penalty.        Considering   all

these,   I proceed to pass the following:-

                             ORDER

Acting U/s.248(2) of Cr.P.C accused no.1 to 3 found guilty for the offences punishable U/s.323,324 r/w. 34 of IPC.

Accused No.1 to 3 are convicted with a fine of Rs.3,000-00/- each (Rupees Three thousand each).

Bail bonds of the accused No.1 to 3 stands cancelled.

(Dictated to the stenographer, transcript thereof, corrected and then pronounced by me in the open court this the 20th January 2016).

(M. LATHAKUMARI) VI Addl.C.M.M. Bangalore City. 4 Annexure

1. Witnesses examined for the prosecution:

Nil.

2.Documents marked on behalf of the prosecution:

Nil.

3. Material objects:

Nil.
VI ADDL.C.M.M.BANGALORE CITY. 5 (Judgment pronounced in the open court) ORDER Acting U/s.248(2) of Cr.P.C accused no.1 to 3 found guilty for the offences punishable U/s.323,324 r/w. 34 of IPC.

Accused No.1 to 3 are convicted with a fine of Rs.3,000-00/- each (Rupees Three thousand each).

Bail bonds of the accused No.1 to 3 stands cancelled.

(Vide Separate Order) (M. LATHAKUMARI) VI Addl.C.M.M. Bangalore City. 6