Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

M/S Jai Shree Om Bana Rudrakash Bio Fuels vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 April, 2022

Author: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Bench: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2153/2022

M/s Jai Shree Om Bana Rudrakash Bio Fuels, Having Address At
Khasra No. 406, 581/239, Rakba 0.12, Gram Lavera, Nasirabad,
Ajmer, Rajasthan Through Sole Proprietor Narpat Singh S/o
Bhanwar Singh Rawat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Kesarpura,
Saradnana, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2.      Poonambhargarh S/o Unknown, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
        Ward No. 9, Shakambhari Road, Udaipurwati, Jhunjhunu,
        Rajasthan,     Presently         At      Dysp       Nasirabad,     Ajmer,
        Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur
                                Mr. Anirudh Tyagi
                                Mr. Buddhi Prakash Meena
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP


     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
                          Order

Order Reserved on                       ::              7.04.2022
Order Pronounced on                     ::              20.04.2022

     The petitioner has filed this petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. for

quashing of FIR No.26/2022 registered at Police Station Shrinagar,

Distt. Ajmer for the offences u/s 3, 7, 4, 8 of Essential

Commodities Act and Section 420, 285, 379, 411 and 120B IPC

and investigation and proceedings arising out from the said FIR.

     Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR was

lodged against the petitioner is completely false and frivolous.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that petitioner is a




                     (Downloaded on 21/04/2022 at 08:47:47 PM)
                                      (2 of 3)                   [CRLMP-2153/2022]



sole proprietorship involved in the business of retail sale of

Biodiesel vide license No.15607/2016 which is granted by the

State of Rajasthan to the petitioner for retail biodiesel in Tehsil

Nasirabad, District Ajmer. Learned counsel for the petitioner also

submitted that the petitioner is registered proprietor whose

registration is valid from 29.7.2020 which is bearing GST

No.08CYCPS6716B2ZE. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that Village Development Department had issued certificate of

registration for selling of biodiesel in favour of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that State of Rajasthan

vide order dt. 13.7.2021 clearly stated that biodiesel does not fall

under the category of Explosives and therefore, it is not governed

by the Petroleum Rules, 2002. Learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that as per order dt.13.7.2021, storage of Biodiesel

Mobile Retail Outlet above the land and below the land upto

30,000 Lt. is permissible and petitioner is doing business as per

the settled principles and rules. Learned counsel for the petitioner

also submits that Biodiesel does not fall under the category of

Petroleum Products. Offence under Essential Commodities Act is

not made out against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that as per the settled direction of the State

Government, no criminal proceedings or FIR be registered against

a license Retail Seller of Biodiesel without sampling of the said

biodiesel. Therefore, present FIR deserves to be quashed and the

petition filed by the petitioner be allowed.

     Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the

following judgments:-State of Haryana & ors. vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal &

ors. reported in 1992 AIR 604; Ms Kotyark Industries Pvt. Ltd. anr.

vs. State of Raj. in S.B. Civil Writs No.4405/2018 decided on

                    (Downloaded on 21/04/2022 at 08:47:47 PM)
                                                                          (3 of 3)                   [CRLMP-2153/2022]



                                   24 April 2018 and M/s Royal Energy Ltd. vs. M/s. Indian Oil Corp.

                                   Ltd. & ors. Case No.1/28 (C-97/2009/DGIR).

                                          Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments

                                   advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that

                                   proceedings done by the concerned police authority, as per Act.

                                   Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that after investigation,

                                   police authority found offence u/s 3/7, 4/7, 7/8 of Essential

                                   Commodities Act and Sections 420, 285, 379/411, 120B IPC and

                                   search operation done by the concerned authority is as per law.

                                   So, petition filed by the petitioner be dismissed.

                                          Learned Public Prosecution has relied upon judgment of

                                   Allahabad High Court in Vishnu Kumar vs. State of UP and ors.

                                   reported in 2020 (138) ALR 678.

                                          I have considered the arguments advanced by learned

                                   counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

It is an admitted position that petitioner had licensed to do retail business of biodiesel. It is also admitted position that biodiesel does not fall under the category of Petroleum Products. So, offences under Essential Commodities Act does not made out against the petitioner. So, proceedings done by the police authority does not seem bona-fide and lawful. So, petition filed by the petitioner deserves to be allowed.

Resultantly, the petition stands allowed and FIR No.26/2022 registered at Police Station Shrinagar, Distt. Ajmer for the offences u/s 3, 7, 4, 8 of Essential Commodities Act and Section 420, 285, 379, 411 and 120B IPC and consequential criminal proceedings thereto, are quashed.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Brijesh 133.

(Downloaded on 21/04/2022 at 08:47:47 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)