Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Vardhman Enterprise vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 6 December, 2017

Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt

Bench: S.R.Brahmbhatt, R.P.Dholaria

                 C/SCA/18598/2017                                                ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                     SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18598 of 2017

         ==========================================================
                          VARDHMAN ENTERPRISE....Petitioner(s)
                                       Versus
                         STATE OF GUJARAT & 3....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MAHAVIR M GADHVI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         MR RONAK RAVAL, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 4
         MR ASHISH H SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 3
         MR JINESH H KAPADIA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 3
         NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 2
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLARIA

                                      Date : 06/12/2017


                                       ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT) Learned AGP Mr.Raval places on record the communication issued by respondent No.3 District Collector to District Sports Officer dated 5.12.2017 and pursuant to the order passed by the Sports Authority of District dated 5.12.2017, the order dated 29.9.2017 granted to Umiya Agro Industries, Visnagar was revoked.

The said communication and order are Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Wed Dec 06 23:20:13 IST 2017 C/SCA/18598/2017 ORDER ordered to be taken on record. In view thereof, learned advocate Mr.Mahavir Gadhvi seeks permission to withdraw this petition. At this stage, Mr.Ashish Shah submitted that as this revocation is affecting his client - respondent No.3, a successful bidder in the tender proceedings which has been revoked now, he will have liberty to take out appropriate remedy to challenge revocation and taking out other remedy available under the law.

When the petitioner's grievances are not surviving in light of the order placed on record dated 5.12.2017, permission as sought for is granted. It goes without saying that this withdrawal shall not affect any right, if any, enuring in respondent No.3 for challenging the same in accordance with law if that remedy is available under the law. Notice is discharged.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) (R.P.DHOLARIA,J.) pathan Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Wed Dec 06 23:20:13 IST 2017