Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Tvl.Next Retail India Ltd vs The Assitant Commissioner (Ct) on 16 March, 2015

Author: S. Vaidyanathan

Bench: S. Vaidyanathan

       

  

   

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:16.03.2015

C O R A M

                  THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN						
W.P.Nos.7306 & 7307 of 2015
and
M.P.Nos.1 & 1  of 2015

Tvl.Next Retail India Ltd.,
New No.50, Old No.25,
Dr.Ambedkar 80 Feet Road,
Kodambakkam, Chennai  600 024.                   ...Petitioner in both the Wps.
Vs.

The Assitant Commissioner (CT)
Kodambakkam Assessment Circle,
Chennai.	                                   ... Respondent in both the Wps.

COMMON  PRAYER:	Writ petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of  Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records  of the respondent  in CST 818929/2012-2013 dated 21.11.2014 and CST  818929/2013-2014 dated 05.12.2014 respectively and quash the same as illegal  and unconstitutional and further direct the respondent  to accept at all the declaration  forms available with the petitioner. 
		  For Petitioner in both the Wps	   : M/s. A. Ravichandran

		  For Respondent in both the Wps. : Mr.A.N.R. Jayapratap 
    				                                  AddlGovernment Pleader




C O M M O N       O R D E R

The petitioner has come forward with the aforesaid prayers.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that for want of Declaration Forms available with the petitioner which could be furnished to the authority concerned in time, the authority has passed an order and he is in possession of the same. He further submitted that he is willing to produce the same along with application filed under Section 84 of the Value Added Tax Act so that it may be considered.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that if any applications are filed, the same would be considered by the authority concerned.

4. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is willing to pay the tax at 10% of the demanded amount under Section 84 of the Value Added Tax Act.

5. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is allowed with liberty to file a petition under Section 84 of the Value Added Tax Act and the petitioner shall deposit 10% of the agreed amount along with application as agreed by him so that the matter would be taken up and decided by the authorities concerned as expeditiously as possible on receipt of the application under Section 84 of the Value Added Tax Act.

With the above observation, the writ petitions are disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

Gv									     16.03.2015 
Index   :Yes/No    
Internet: Yes/No


To
The Assitant Commissioner (CT)
Kodambakkam Assessment Circle,
Chennai.


















 S. VAIDYANATHAN, J.
gv







W.P.Nos.7306 & 7307 of 2015
and
M.P.Nos.1 & 1  of 2015













16.03.2015