Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Indira Mahindra vs Devender Jamwal on 8 August, 2018

Author: Vivek Singh Thakur

Bench: Vivek Singh Thakur

Civil Suit No. 4 of 2007  08.08.2018 Present: Mr.   Ajay   Kumar,   Senior   Advocate,   with   Mr. .

Dheeraj K. Vashisth, Advocate, for the plaintiff.

Ms.   Seema   K.   Guleria,   Advocate,   for   defendants No. 1 and 2.

Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate, for defendant No. 3.

Mr.   G.R.   Palsra,   Advocate,   for   defendants   No.   4 and 9 to 11.

Ms.   Reeta   Thakur,   Advocate,   vice   Mr.   Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for defendants No. 5 to 8.

On behalf of the plaintiff, certified copies of certain documents pertaining to Civil Suit No. 7 of 2013, titled Smt. Indira Mahindra versus Devender  Jamwal, pending  in the Court of ADJ (II), Mandi, have been proposed to be placed on record by exhibiting the same on the basis of record sought to be produced through official witness called from the Court of ADJ (II), Mandi.  

Learned   counsel   for   the   defendants   have   raised objection with regard to production of these documents, at this   stage,   on   the   ground   that   these   documents   have   not been produced alongwith the plaint and permission has not been sought to produce the same.

Learned   counsel   for   the   plaintiff   submits   that these documents pertain to a  civil  suit filed  by defendant­ Indira  Mahindra  against defendants No. 3 and 9 after filing ::: Downloaded on - 09/08/2018 23:02:04 :::HCHP ­: 2 :­ .

of plaint in the present suit and these documents belong to defendant and were in possession of the defendant and, thus, it was not possible for the plaintiff to file these documents alongwith the plaint.  Therefore, he prays for grant of leave to produce these documents at this stage.

For   the   reasons   assigned   for   late   production   of these   documents,   leave   to   produce   these   documents   in evidence is granted.

Statements of two PWs, i.e. PW­12 Vijay Kumar and PW­13 Nek Ram Thakur stand recorded.  

There   is   a   request   on   behalf   of   PW­Pushpender Singh, Criminal Ahlmad in the office of ADJ (II), Mandi, for exempting   his   presence   on   the   ground   that   he   has   been advised for admission in hospital today, i.e. 8th August, 2018, for the purpose of tests etc. to be conducted before operating him by the Surgery Department in Government Ayurvedic Hospital, Paprola.   The said witness has informed that the record   sought   to  be  produced  through  him   with  respect  to case titled State versus Khub Ram has now been sent back to  the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st  Class,  Court  No.  2, Mandi.  

::: Downloaded on - 09/08/2018 23:02:04 :::HCHP

­: 3 :­ .

In   these   circumstances,   the   said   witness   is exempted   and   plaintiff   is   directed   to   take   fresh   steps   for summoning the Criminal Ahlmad from the Court of Judicial Magistrate   1st  Class,   Court   No.   2,   Mandi,   to   produce   the relevant record.

As   the   original   sale   deed   sought   to   be   produced through   PW­13   Nek   Ram   Thakur   is   in   possession   of   the police, the plaintiff, if so advised, may take appropriate steps for summoning the said record, if necessary.

In   terms   of   the   previous   order,   plaintiff   has   to produce witnesses­Omeshwar Singh and Maan Singh on self responsibility.     Witness­Maan   Singh   is   present,   however, witness­Omeshwar   Singh   is   not   present   on   account   of   a function   in   the   family.     Both   these   witnesses   are   to   be examined   together.     Therefore,   recording   of   statement   of witness­Maan Singh is deferred.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the plaintiff that now only the official witness for production of original sale deed No. 251/2008 is to be examined before examining witnesses­Omeshwar   Singh   and   Maan   Singh.     Therefore, plaintiff  is  permitted  to summon the witness for production ::: Downloaded on - 09/08/2018 23:02:04 :::HCHP ­: 4 :­ .

of original sale deed No. 251/2008 either from the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No. 2, Mandi or from the Police Department or from both the offices/court.

List   for   recording   of   remaining   evidence   of   the plaintiff   on   a   date   to   be   fixed   by   Additional   Registrar (Judicial)   on   which   date   witnesses­Omeshwar   Singh   and Maan   Singh   shall   remain   present   for   recording   their evidence.

                                                         (Vivek Singh Thakur)                                            Judge August 08, 2018             ( rajni ) ::: Downloaded on - 09/08/2018 23:02:04 :::HCHP