Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

M/S Gauri Ispat Pvt. Ltd. And Anr vs Authorized Officer, Syndicate Bank And ... on 9 August, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                      1

                                                                                          NAFR

                         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                           WPC No. 1200 of 2013

                1. M/s Gauri Ispat Private Limited, Industrial Growth Centre, Borai, Durg (C.G.)
                   through the Director, Brij Jeevan Rai, S/o Ramvriksh Rai, aged about 51
                   years, R/o House No. 135/136, (Opp. House No. 262), Street No. 5-B,
                   Shanti Nagar, Kohka, Bhilai, Police Station Bhilai, Civil and Revenue District
                   Durg (C.G.)

                2. Brij Jeevan Rai, S/o Ramvriksh Rai, aged about 51 years, R/o House No.
                   135/136, (Opp. House No. 262), Street No. 5-B, Shanti Nagar, Kohka,
                   Bhilai, Police Station Bhilai, Civil and Revenue District Durg (C.G.)
                                                                                  ---- Petitioners

                                                   Versus

                1. Authorized Officer, Syndicate Bank, through Branch Manager, Chandra
                   Maurya Complex, G.E. Road, Bhilai, Police Station - Bhilai, Civil and
                   Revenue District Durg (C.G.)

                2. Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank, Chandra Maurya Complex, G.E. Road,
                   Bhilai, Police Station - Bhilai, Civil and Revenue District Durg (C.G.)

                3. Syndicate Bank, through the Chief Managing Director, Head Quarter
                   Mainpal (Karnataka) Pin 576104                ---- Respondents

For Petitioners : Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. P. R. Patankar, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 09/08/18

1. Mr. Prateek Sharma submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka