Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh vs The State Of Bihar Through Senior ... on 9 April, 2019

Author: Ashwani Kumar Singh

Bench: Ashwani Kumar Singh

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.562 of 2019
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Vaishali
     ======================================================
     Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh, Male aged about 60 years S/o Ram
     Bichar Singh, Resident of Village-Basudeopur Chandel, P.S.-Mahua, District-
     Vaishali at present residing at Ward no.16, Chandraharpur, Muktapur, District-
     Samastipur.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar through Senior Superintendent Of Police, Vaishali
2.   The Senior Superintendent of Police, Vaishali.
3.   The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Sub Division, Mahnar, District-Vaishali.
4.   The Chairperson of Mahnar Police Station or Officer Incharge of Mahnar
     Police Station,Dist.-Vaishali .
5.   The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mahnar Sub Division, District-Vaishali.
6.   Nabin Singh Male aged about 42 years Son of Late Nagendra Singh,
     Resident of Village-Basudeopur, Resident of Village Chandel, P.S.-Mahnar,
     District-Vaishali.
7.   Mukesh Singh Male aged about 38 years Son of Late Nagendra Singh,
     Resident of Village-Basudeopur, Resident of Village Chandel, P.S.-Mahnar,
     District-Vaishali.
8.   Amaresh Singh Male aged about 40 years Son of Late Nagendra Singh,
     Resident of Village-Basudeopur, Resident of Village Chandel, P.S.-Mahnar,
     District-Vaishali.

                                               ... ... Respondents
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner        :        Ms. Vagisha Pragya Vacarnavi, Advocate
                                        Mr. Manu Tripurari, Advocate
                                        Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s      :        Mr.Manish Kumar, GP-4
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     Date : 09-04-2019

                     The petitioner filed an application making complaint

     against respondent no. 6 before the Officer-in-charge of Mahnar

     Police Station. Since the police failed to take any action, he

     preferred an application before the Sub-Divisional Police Officer
 Patna High Court CR. WJC No.562 of 2019 dt.09-04-2019
                                            2/3




       on 07.06.2018 and requested to take action against respondent no.

       6, whereafter, Mahnar police lodged a non-FIR Case No. 57 of

       2018 dated 06.08.2018 and a report was sent to the Sub-Divisional

       Magistrate, Mahnar to initiate a proceeding under Section 144 of

       the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'CrPC') against both the

       parties.     On receipt of report of respondent no. 4, the Sub-

       Divisional Magistrate, Mahnar initiated a proceeding under

       Section 144 of the CrPC against the petitioner and respondent no.

       6. By his order dated 17.09.2018 restrained both the parties from

       going near the land in question. During the pendency of the

       proceeding under Section 144 of the CrPC, respondent no. 6

       allegedly violated the injunction order. Thereafter, an application

       was filed by the petitioner on 20.10.2018 before the Sub-

       Divisional Magistrate for initiating a proceeding under Section 188

       of the CrPC against respondent no. 6, pursuant to which, on

       20.10.2018

, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate called for a report from Mahnar Police. But, no report has been sent by the Mahnar Police.

2. Being aggrieved by non-compliance of the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before this Court seeking execution of the order of the Sub-Division Magistrate dated 20.10.2018.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.562 of 2019 dt.09-04-2019 3/3

3. The writ petition is thoroughly misconceived. The extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be abused for the purpose of seeking execution of an order passed by a court of executive Magistrate. It is dismissed, accordingly.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) kanchan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          16.04.2019
Transmission Date       16.04.2019