Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Chandra Reddy vs The District Revenue Officer on 12 July, 2017

Author: M.Duraiswamy

Bench: M.Duraiswamy

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
DATED: 12.07.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
Writ Petition No.16185 of 2017

1.Chandra Reddy
2.Nanjunda Reddy 						...   Petitioners

v.

1.The District Revenue Officer,
   Krishnagiri District.

2.The Sub Collector,
   Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Tahsildar,
   Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

4.The Block Development Officer,
   Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 				... Respondents

	Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.05.2017 for rectification of errors crept-in in the revenue records which were wrongly updated during UDR in respect of the lands to an extent of 0.38 cents comprised in S.No.896/A2 of Nallur Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District and issue patta to the petitioners within the time to be stipulated by this court. 
		 For Petitioners     	  : Mr.R.Bharath Kumar
	       For Respondents	  : Mr.E.Balamurugan, AGP

ORDER 

The petitioners have filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 17.05.2017 for rectification of errors crept-in, in the revenue records, which were wrongly updated during UDR in respect of the lands to an extent of 0.38 cents comprised in S.No.896/A2 of Nallur Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District and issue patta to the petitioners within the time to be stipulated by this Court.

2. Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that inspite of the petitioners' representation dated 17.05.2017 for rectification of errors crept-in, in the revenue records, the first respondent has not passed any order so far.

3. Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Additional Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents, submitted that the first respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' representation and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioners, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the first respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 17.05.2017 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.


	With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.  																			12.07.2017
Index          :  Yes/No
rk

To
1.The District Revenue Officer,
   Krishnagiri District.

2.The Sub Collector,
   Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Tahsildar,
   Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

4.The Block Development Officer,
   Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 		


 

M.DURAISWAMY, J.

 rk
											
 











 

W.P.No.16185 of 2017















12.07.2017