Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 15]

Gujarat High Court

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 vs Suzlon Energy Ltd....Opponent(S) on 21 June, 2016

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, A.J. Shastri

                  O/TAXAP/402/2016                                              ORDER



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                 TAX APPEAL NO. 402 of 2016
         ==========================================================
                   PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4....Appellant(s)
                                     Versus
                          SUZLON ENERGY LTD....Opponent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR NITIN K MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI

                                      Date : 21/06/2016


                                       ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. Tax Appeal is  ADMITTED  for considering following  substantial questions of law.

[A] Whether   the   Appellate   Tribunal   is   right   in  law and on facts in allowing netting of interest  to compute eligible deduction u/s.80IB of the Act  while   confirming   disallowance   of   deduction   u/s.  80IB of the Act in respect of interest income on  FDR and ICD ?

To be heard with Tax Appeal No.220 of 2013.

2. We   noticed   that   the   Revenue   has   also   suggested  another question which pertains to the deduction under  section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu Jun 23 02:32:01 IST 2016 O/TAXAP/402/2016 ORDER of duty draw back.  The Revenue relies on the decision  of Supreme Court in case of Liberty India and Ors. vs   CIT, reported in 317 ITR 218.  However, this issue is  at   large   before   the   Assessing   Officer,     we   have   no  reason to interfere at this stage.  Second question is  therefore not considered. 

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (A.J. SHASTRI, J.) ANKIT Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Thu Jun 23 02:32:01 IST 2016