Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Swetha S vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2016

Bench: Jayant Patel, Aravind Kumar

                          1




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016

                       PRESENT

        THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL

                         AND

       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

      WRIT PETITION NO.53590/2016 (EDN-MED-ADM)


BETWEEN:

SWETHA S
AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS
D/O SHANKAR M
NO.55, 1ST CROSS
PNS LAYOUT,
SUBBANNA PALYA
M.S. NAGAR POST
BENGALURU-560 033
                                         ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI AJOY KUMAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
       HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE
       SERVICES (MEDICAL EDUCATION)
       VIKASA SOUDHA,
       DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
                               2




     BENGALURU-560 001.

2.   THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL
     EDUCATION, ANAND RAO
     CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 009.

3.   COMED-K
     CONSORTIUM OF MEDICAL
     ENGINEERING & DENTAL
     COLLEGES OF KARNATAKA
     #132, 2ND FLOOR, 11TH MAIN
     17TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM
     BENGALURU-560 055
     REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
                                             ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI M MUNIGANAPPA, HCGP)



     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT
THE R-3 TO ALLOT A MEDICAL SEAT TO THE PETITIONER
IN ANY OF ITS MEMBER INSTITUTIONS FOR THE 1ST YEAR
MBBS COURSE UNDER THE COMED-K QUOTA FOR THE
ACADEMIC     YEAR   2016-17       ON   THE   BASIS   OF   HER
RANKING IN NEET-2016.


     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
                               3




                           ORDER

Mr. Ajoy Kumar Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that as per enquiry made by the petitioner, last candidate selected is having higher merit in comparison to the petitioner. Hence, he does not press the present petition.

Permission granted. Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed accordingly.

SD/-

JUDGE SD/-

JUDGE DR