Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Mander Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 18 May, 2023

Author: Pankaj Jain

Bench: Pankaj Jain

                                                  Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:072901




209                                                       2023:PHHC:072901
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                   AT CHANDIGARH

                      Date of decision : 18th May, 2023

                             CWP-23480-2015
Mander Singh                                                        ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                    CWP-26411-2014 (O&M)
Jiwan Singh and another                                           ....Petitioners

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                            CWP-23474-2015
Prem Singh                                                          ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                            CWP-23317-2016
Ajay Sharma                                                         ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                             CWP-5242-2017
Gurnam Singh                                                        ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                         CWP-5257-2017
Sukhpreet Singh and others                                        ....Petitioners

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents



                              1 of 7
           ::: Downloaded on - 13-06-2023 09:28:11 :::
                                                   Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:072901




CWP No.23480 of 2015 and                                                   2
other connected cases
                                                             2023:PHHC:072901




                       CWP-22402-2019 (O&M)
ASI LR Jasvir Singh                                                ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                        CWP-22807-2019
Jaswant Singh and another                                         ....Petitioners

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                            CWP-19614-2020
HC (PR) Parabjit Singh                                             ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                            CWP-18584-2021
Kamaljit Singh                                                     ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                           CWP-18309-2021
Kulbir Singh                                                       ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents

                             CWP-7699-2021
ASI (LR) Hans Raj                                                  ....Petitioner

                                       Versus

State of Punjab and others                                      ...Respondents



                              2 of 7
           ::: Downloaded on - 13-06-2023 09:28:11 :::
                                                    Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:072901




CWP No.23480 of 2015 and                                                    3
other connected cases
                                                              2023:PHHC:072901




CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

Present :   Mr. Kamaldeep S. Sidhu, Advocate
            for the petitioners in rest of the cases.

            Mr. D.S. Rawat, Advocate
            for the petitioner in CWP-18584-2021.

            Mr. Aman Dhir, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

The present batch of writ petitions relates to police personnel recruited as Constables but picked for handling Dogs in the Police Dog Squad and thus loosely called as Dog Handlers. Once these personnel are picked they are required to pass a course known as the Dog Handler Course.

2. The grievance raised in the present writ petitions is w.r.t. the promotion as Head Constables and the consequential benefits. The Director General of Police, Punjab vide Annexure P-6 dated 10th of December, 2013, ordered that the Dog Handler Course be equated to the Lower School Course and laid down the service conditions and guidelines for further action as under :-

"I. All the Dog handlers who have been promoted on adhoc basis after passing the Dog handler Course from Takenpur or PPA/PHR and still performing the duties of Dog handlers may be promoted on regular basis from the date they were promoted on Adhoc Basis. II. If their juniors have already been promoted as ASI after

3 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 13-06-2023 09:28:11 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:072901 CWP No.23480 of 2015 and 4 other connected cases 2023:PHHC:072901 passing the Inter Mediate School Course they may also be given deeme d date of promotion Dog handler who have passed Inter Mediate School Course from the date their juniors have been promoted as ASI.

III. All Constables who have passed the Dog handler course and fulfill other conditions & continue to perform their duty in Dog Squad but not promoted to the rank of Head Constable in Dog Squad may be promoted as Head Constable (Dog handler) with immediate effect. IV. Those dog handlers promoted to the rank of ASI against General Vacancy will remain in Dog squad wing and not be shifted to or treated as District Police."

3. Following the aforesaid order, some of the petitioners have been granted promotions but notionally w.e.f. 10th of December, 2013 vide order dated 13th of August, 2018. The claim for the arrears have been declined.

4. Mr. Sidhu, Counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents themselves have recognized the fact that handling an animal is quite a tedious and specialized task for which the personnel are required to undergo special course and have thus rightly recognized the equivalence of that course with that of Lower School Course. He further submits that it has also been resolved by the respondents that despite earning promotions, keeping in view the nature of relationship that the petitioners enjoy with the Dog and that they remain attached to the Dog doing the same work meaning thereby 4 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 13-06-2023 09:28:11 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:072901 CWP No.23480 of 2015 and 5 other connected cases 2023:PHHC:072901 discharging same duties, the monetary benefits ought not have been denied as even after promotion there is no change in the nature of job being undertaken by the petitioners. He further submits that once the Authorities have equated Dog Handler Course to the Lower School Course, the petitioners are deemed to be on List C-1 and this is the precise mandate of Anneuxre P-6. He further submits that even where the personnel get further promotion he still remains along with the Dog or remain in the Dog Handling Squad. Thus promotional benefits must enure to the petitioners.

5. Mr. Rawat, Counsel appearing for the petitioner in CWP No.18584 of 2021 submits though the petitioner cleared Dog Handler Course on 8th of March, 2014 yet he has not been promoted.

6. Per contra, Mr. Dhir submits that Annexure P-6 has been issued by DGP exercising powers under Rule 13.2(1) and the same cannot have an effect of bringing the persons who have passed Dog Handler Course on List C-1 though he does not dispute the fact that despite earning promotions the petitioners who are working as Dog Handlers keep on performing the same duties.

7. In view of the above after hearing counsel for the parties this Court finds that vide Annexure P-6 the Higher Authority of the Department has already taken a conscious decision to the effect that:

(a) Dog handler is a nomenclature for any Head Constable 5 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 13-06-2023 09:28:11 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:072901 CWP No.23480 of 2015 and 6 other connected cases 2023:PHHC:072901 rank official (adhoc/regular) who has passed the Dog Handler Course and handles/trains and maintain a dog in the Dog Squad;

(b) It is mandatory for the personnel working as a Dog Handler to undergo a specialized course of Dog Handler Course at BSF Academy Takenpur (M.P.) or at PPA Phillaur;

(c) The Dog Handler Course at BSF Academy or PPA Phillaur is equivalent to Lower School Course for the promotion to Head Constable from the date when they successfully passed the Dog Handler Course;

(d) The persons employed in the Dog Squad shall be treated separately for the promotion purposes; and

(e) Even after having been promoted as Head Constable there is no change in the nature of duties of these personnel.

8. In view of above, all the writ petitions are disposed off. The personnel who have been promoted with retrospective effect are held entitled for arrears of the promotional post from the day they have been promoted as the principle of 'No Work No Pay' is not applicable keeping in view the admitted case that the promotion does not alter the nature of duties performed by Dog Handler.

6 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 13-06-2023 09:28:11 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:072901 CWP No.23480 of 2015 and 7 other connected cases 2023:PHHC:072901

9. Further respondents are directed to consider the case of other personnel who have passed the Dog Handler Course in accordance with the decision already taken vide Annexure P-6 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

10. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.

11. A copy of this order be kept on the files of other connected cases.

May 18, 2023                                             (Pankaj Jain)
Dpr                                                         Judge
           Whether speaking/reasoned :              Yes/No
           Whether reportable                :      Yes/No




Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:072901 7 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 13-06-2023 09:28:11 :::