Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Parvathamma vs Sri Dr Mohammed Altaf Hussain on 11 June, 2020

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M. Nagaprasanna

                           1




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

         DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2020

                        BEFORE

       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA

       WRIT PETITION No.19973/2019 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN :

SMT PARVATHAMMA
W/O LATE LINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT 16TH CROSS
SHREE GANDHADA NAGARA
HEGGANAHALLI
VISHVANIDAM POST
BANGALORE-560 001

                                        ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI H.V. MANJUNATHA, ADVOCATE)

AND :

1.     SRI DR. MOHAMMED ALTAF HUSSAIN
       S/O G. HUSSAIN PIRAL
       AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
       R/AT NO.732
       12TH MAIN III STAGE,
       RAJAJINAGAR
       BANGALORE-560 010

2.     SRI SADIQ
       S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF
       AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
                              2




      R/AT NO.18,
      KAREMSAB LAYOUT,
      SHREEGANDHADA KAVALU-560 090

                                           ... RESPONDENTS
                             ---

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 08.04.2019
MADE ON IA NO.10 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC
TO REOPEN THE CASE FROM THE STAGE OF DEFENDANT
EVIDENCE TO CROSS OF PW1 IN O.S.NO.1166 OF 2010
ON THE FILE OF XII ADDL CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-27) AT
BANGALORE VIDE ANNX-A AND TO ALLOW THE SAID
APPLICATION.

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO
CONFERENCE IN BENGALURU MADE THE FOLLOWING;


                         ORDER

This writ petition is filed against the order made on I.A. NO.10 dated 08.04.2019 in O.S. No.1166/2010 on the file of XII Addl. City Civil Judge (CCH-27) at Bangalore vide Annexure-A. 3

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the suit itself is decreed on 03.08.2019, hence, the present petition is rendered infrutuous.

3. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/-

JUDGE SBS*