Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Vinitha vs The Principal Secretary To on 12 February, 2019

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                                1



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED :12.02.2019

                                                          CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                                W.P.No.157 of 2018
                                                        and
                                             W.M.P.Nos.217 & 246 of 2018
                      M.Vinitha                                                      ...Petitioner

                                                          Vs

                      1.The Principal Secretary to
                         Government of Tamil Nadu
                        Department of Social Welfare,
                        Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

                      2.The Commissioner,
                        Panchayat Union,
                        Kaveripakkam, Vellore District.

                      3.Mrs.Paun                                               ....Respondents



                      Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus To call for the entire
                      records in pursuant to the selection order issued by the 2nd respondent in
                      favour of the 3rd respondent to the post of Noon Meal Organiser
                      Panchayat Union Elementary School Malaimedu and quash the same with
                      a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to appoint the petitioner in
                      the said post within a stipulated time.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                            2



                                  For Petitioner      : Mr.T.P.Prabakaran

                                  For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi
                                                    Additional Government Pleader

                                                        Mrs.A.Srijayanthi for R2


                                                       ORDER

The grievance of the writ petitioner is that though she is fully qualified for appointment to the post of Noon Meal Organiser in Panchayat Union Elementary School, her case was not considered without any valid reason.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner has attended the interview for appointment to the post of Noon Mool Organiser on 26.04.2017 and she was asked to produce certain documents at the time of interview. As directed by the 2nd respondent, the petitioner has submitted all the documents. In spite of that, the case of the writ petitioner was not considered for appointment.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted a proceeding issued by the Personal Assistant (NMP) to Collector, Vellore-9, which states as follows:

The petitioner and the selected candidate obtained the http://www.judis.nic.in 3 marks in the interview on 26.04.2017 detailed are below for the post of Noon Meal Organiser in Malaimedu Panchayat Union Primary School.
Category:BC (Non-Priority) S.No Particulars Maximum Marks Petitioner Marks obtained by (R.Vinitha the w/o Candidate Narasimman) Selected (Pavun w/o Vimal)
1. Age Factor (both 5marks - -
                                 are    below   35)
                                 (01.12.2016
                                 Candidate     must
                                 have completion of
                                 minimum age 21 &
                                 not exceed for 40)
                          2    For        resident 20    Marks -                     20 marks
                          (A). within    one    km (maximum)
                               radius   of    Noon
                               Meal Centre
                          (b)    For        resident 10 marks          -             -
                                 outside the 1 km
                                 radius but within
                                 2 km distance from
                                 the    Noon    meal
                                 centre
                          (c)    For        resident 5 marks           5 marks       -
                                 outside     2    km
                                 radius but within
                                 3 km distance from
                                 the    Noon    Meal
                                 Centre
                          3.     For     possessing 5/2 marks          -             -
                                 Ration       card-
                                 Anthothya     Anna
                                 Yogana card/Green
                                 Card
                          4(A) For          Destitute 10 marks         -             -
                               Widow


http://www.judis.nic.in 4 S.No Particulars Maximum Marks Petitioner Marks obtained by (R.Vinitha the w/o Candidate Narasimman) Selected (Pavun w/o Vimal)
(b) For Deserted Woman 5 marks 5 marks -
                                 (Abandoned      by
                                 husband)/Widow
                          5.     Candidate who are 5 marks               -             -
                                 having two female
                                 children
                          6.     For knowledge          in 5 marks       2 marks       -
                                 maintaining
                                 Accounts
                                 Total                      50 marks     12 marks      20 marks



Petitioner R.Vinitha Date of Birth (as per certificate 23.06.1996) at the time of Interview Petitioner R.Vinitha Age was 20 she is not eligible for this post.

4. In view of the fact that the writ petitioner is underaged and not completed 21 year of age as on 01.12.2016, she was not selected and therefore, this Court is of an opinion that there is no infirmity as such in respect of the decision taken by the competent authority. The Date of Birth of the writ petitioner is 23.06.1996 and therefore, she had not completed 21 years of age as on the date of the notification on 01.12.2016. http://www.judis.nic.in 5

5. Thus, the writ petition is devoid of merits and accordingly, stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

12.02.2019 sk Internet:Yes/No Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order To

1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Department of Social Welfare, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Kaveripakkam, Vellore District.

http://www.judis.nic.in 6 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

sk W.P.No.157 of 2018 12.02.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in