Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 194]

Kerala High Court

Narayanan Namboodiri vs The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) on 16 May, 2017

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                        PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

              WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1939

                              WP(C).No. 28398 of 2017
                              -----------------------



PETITIONER:
----------

              NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, 94 YEARS,
              S/O. BRAHMADETHAN NAMBOODIRI,
              MUTHUKURISSI MANA, NADUNGOTTUR,
              POST GANESHGIRI, SHORNUR-679 123.


              BY ADVS.SRI.R.SREEHARI
                      SRI.SACHIN VYAS



RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

       1.     THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS)
              OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L R),
              MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM-679 101.

       2.     THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
              SHORNUR II VILLAGE, SHORNUR,
              PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 123.


              BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SABU


              THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
              ON 14-03-2018 ALONG WITH WPC.29829/2017 & CONNECTED CASES,
              THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 28398 of 2017 (Y)
---------------------------

                                    APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
----------------------

EXHIBIT P1       PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPORT DATED 16-05-2017 OF THE
                 2ND   RESPONDENT SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2       PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 18-05-2017 ISSUED
                 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3       PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 18977/2017
                 DATED 08-06-2017.


RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:        NIL
---------------------

                                                                   /TRUE COPY/


                                                                   P.S.TO JUDGE

mbr/
14.03.2018.

                  A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
                =========================
                       W.P.(C).Nos.
           28398/2017   38271/2017   40993/2017    1928/2018
           29829/2017   39068/2017   40999/2017    2193/2018
           30228/2017   40372/2017   41027/2017    2418/2018
           30595/2017   40378/2017   41324/2017    2420/2018
           30596/2017   40524/2017   41791/2017    2480/2018
           30648/2017   40548/2017     108/2018    2696/2018
           34401/2017   40656/2017     489/2018    4391/2018
           34492/2017   40712/2017     854/2018    4499/2018
           34500/2017   40718/2017     935/2018    6163/2018
           36423/2017   40724/2017      963/2018   6575/2018
           37354/2017   40982/2017    1181/2018    7932/2018
           37981/2017   40988/2017    1813/2018        &
                                                   8455/2018


              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       Dated this the 14th day of March,                   2018


                        J U D G M E N T

These writ petitions are filed for expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal. The petitioners approached the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificates. Many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificates when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications is now a routine affair before this Court. This Court found that, breaking the queue by WPC 28398/2017 & c/cases -:2:- directing the Land Tribunal to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Land Tribunal. The Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. Some of the cases are pending for more than 3 to 4 years. In places like Thrissur, Ottapalam, Tirur, Kozhikode and Koothuparamba more than Nos.7000 cases are pending. Taking note of the volume of the pending cases, this Court directed the Government to issue guidelines for expeditious disposal of the cases. One of the factors which led to the delay, is obtaining report through the Revenue Inspectors. The Government now by an order, G.O. (P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22/2/2018, appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal for exercising certain powers of the Revenue Inspectors. That be so, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. This Court also directed the Government to consider speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Government in principle agreed for such requirements and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to the cases of the WPC 28398/2017 & c/cases -:3:- senior citizens. It may be noted that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notices on the landlords. This can be averted if the petitioners in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notices to such persons.

2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal:

i. If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained.
ii. Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months.
iii. In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by WPC 28398/2017 & c/cases -:4:- the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority.
iv. The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications.
v. In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above.
vi. In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed.
vii. The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22/2/2018 will form part of this Judgment.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms WPC 28398/2017 & c/cases -:5:- WPC 28398/2017 & c/cases -:6:-