Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Inderpal @ Sonu vs The State Of Haryana on 3 January, 2022

Bench: M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

     ITEM NO.14                      Court 13 (Video Conferencing)                   SECTION II-B

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No. 45254/2019

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-07-2019
     in CRAD No. 337-DB/2018 passed by the High Court Of Punjab &
     Haryana at Chandigarh)

     INDERPAL @ SONU                                                              Petitioner(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     THE STATE OF HARYANA                                                         Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 195835/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
      IA No. 38511/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
      IA No. 38510/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
      IA No. 9377/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     Date : 03-01-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
                             HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

     For Petitioner(s)                     Mr. Shikhil Shiv Suri, Adv.
                                            Mrs. Madhu Suri, Adv.
                                            Mrs. Jyoti Venkatesh, Adv.
                                           Ms. Nikita Thapar, Adv.
                                           Ms. Vinishma Kaul, Adv.
                                           Ms. Komal Gupta, Adv.
                                           Ms. Mahima Aggarwal, Adv.
                                           Ms. Nidhi, AOR

     For Respondent(s)


                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Having heard Shri Shikhil Shiv Suri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and having gone through the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by R material on record, we see no reason to interfere with the Natarajan Date: 2022.01.05 16:46:56 IST Reason: impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court as well as the judgment and order passed by the Trial Court convicting Contd..

- 2 -

the accused for the offences under Sections 302, 364, 395 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Hence, the Special Leave petition stands dismissed.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of (NEETU SACHDEVA) (VIRENDER SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER