Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Dr. D.K.Lahiri vs Telecom District Manager on 17 September, 1994

  
 
 
 
 
 
 IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION





 

 



 

IN THE STATE CONSUMER
DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

 

MEGHALAYA, SHILLONG

 

 

 

C.P. NO.7(S) OF 1994

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Dr. D.K.Lahiri  ... Appellant

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 -Vs-

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Telecom District Manager  ....................Respondents

 

Shillong 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

B E F O R E

 

 MR
JUSTICE D.N.CHOUDHURY,PRESIDENT

 

THE LEARNED MEMBER
SHRI R.S.LYNGDOH AND SMTI.T.PHANBUH

 

  

 

  

 

For the Appellant Mr.
Jindal

 

  

 

Respondent Mr.
Purkayastha

 

 

 

Date of Order 17.9.1994

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

ORDER

.

 

Heard Mr. Jindal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the respondents. Though Mr.Purkayastha has stated that before the State Commission computer print was supplied, we find that it was not done for the entire disputed period.

 

Mr.Jindal has further submitted that inspite of repeated reminders, STD facilities have not been disconnected and it is misused by the department. Mr.S.S.Tewari, Accounts officer has stated that STD has been disconnected, but he cannot give the exact date.

 

Considering the nature of dispute and on going through the computer print supplied, we are of the opinion that an enquiry is called for as to whether the STD facilities of a particular telephone has been misused or whether telephone department has disconnected the STD facilities of the petitioners telephone number being 224417.

 

We direct the Superintendent of Police, CSI, Shillong to investigate the matter and also connected matters regarding proper functioning of the telephone exchange, Shillong included the computer for STD in Exchange. The report may be submitted to us within a period of two months from today.

 

It is stated by Mr.Jindal that cheque No.184095 dated 6.9.94 drawn on SBI was handed over to Mr.Tewari, but he refused to accept the cheque and the application. This fact has been denied by Mr.Tewari. The cheque along with the letter and the copy of the order of this commission has been produced and we have handed over to Mr.Tewari and it shall be deemed that the amount has been paid and accordingly Mr.Tewari is directed to send a receipt by post to the petitioner .

 

A copy of this order along with the petition, the Annexures and counter-affidavit may be sent to the Superintendent of Police, C.B.I.Shilllong   Let the matter come up after 2 months.

           

Member President