Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Prathapan P vs Kerala Public Service Commissione

Author: K. Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                         PRESENT:

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

      WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937

                                WP(C).No. 20902 of 2014 (K)
                                   ----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------

        1. PRATHAPAN P., AGED 27 YEARS
           S/O.PRABHAKARAN, "ASWATHI", VANDOOR (VIA)
           CHATHENGOTTUPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM -679 328.

        2. BIJUKUMAR T, AGED 36 YEARS
           S/O.THANKASWAMY (LATE), 'BETHSAIDA', PLAMTHOTTAM
           TIRUPURAM P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMDIST
           PIN - 695 133.

        3. BIJEESH KUMAR K.M, AGED 29 YEARS
           S/O.KUMARAN P.T., KARUVOTHMEETHAL
           KOOTHALI P.O, PERAMBRA (VIA)
           KOZHIKODE - 673 525
         (*P3 IS DELETED AS PER ORDER DATED 23.09.2014 IN IA. 12502/2014.)

        4. DEEPU.H AGED 35 YEARS
           S/O.K.HARIDAS, KIZHAKKEVELIYIL, KATTOOR P.O.
           SARVODAYAPURAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688 546.

        5. SAJID P, AGED 26 YEARS
           S/O.MOOSA, KALLIDUMBIL HOUSE, AMAYOOR P.O.
           MALAPPURAM - 676 123.

           BY ADVS.SRI.B.S.SIVAJI
                         SRI.P.SREEKUMAR

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

        1. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONE
           PATTOM, PIN - 695 004
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED
           BY ITS SECRETARY.

        2. KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
           JALA BHAVAN
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033, REPRESENTED BY
           ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
                                                                   CONTD .. 2..
                                                 .. 2 ..
WP(C).No. 20902 of 2014 (K)

 3. THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
  GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT
  THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
  SECRETARY.

4. STATE OF KERALA
  REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
  WATER RESOURCES (WSB) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA
  THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 1

  R2 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
  R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC
  R3 & 4 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE

  THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
 ON 30-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
  FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 20902 of 2014 (K)
---------------------------------------
                                           APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------

EXT.P-1:           TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF RANKED
                   LIST OF FITTER (CATEGORY NO.25/2008) DT.4.5.2011

EXT.P-2:           TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.3943/AD3/2014/ADM.DATED
                   13.2.2014 BY GOVT.

EXT.P-3:           TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION AV (2) 4182/02/GW DATED
                   28.3.2014 BY THE IST RESPONDENT

EXT.P-4:           TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2.9.2013 BY THE
                   FITTER RANK HOLDERS ASSOCIATION 2011-14

EXT.P-5:           TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF G.O(P)
                   NO.58/2012/FIN. DATED 19.1.2012 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

EXT.P-6:           TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION NO.96951/INFR.1/2012/FIN.
                   DATED 3.12.2012

EXT.P-7:           TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION NO.55956/INF.2/2014/FIN.
                   DATED 27.6.2014

EXT.P8             COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.KWA/JB/E7/22541/2014 DATED
                   25/11/14 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P9             COPY OF THE REPLY NO.KWA/JB/E-7/4802/2011 DATED 28/3/14
                   WITH RELEVANT PAGES OF NOTE FILE ISSUED BY THE STATE
                   PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER UNDER THE 2ND
                   RESPONDENT.

EXT.P10            COPY OF THE ORDER G.O(MS) NO.53/05/WRD DATED 21.10.05
                   ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P11            COPY OF THE INFORMATION NO. KWA/JB/E-7/RTI/4620/2011
                   DATED 23/9/11.

EXT.P12            COPY OF THE INFORMATION NO.KWA/JB/E-7/4620/2011 DATED
                   8.3.13.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

EXT.R2(A)          COPY OF PROCEEDINGS VIDE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/4626/2011,
                   DATED 6.9.13

                                         // true copy //


                                         P.A to Judge
SB



                    K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
                =====================
                  W.P.(C) No.20902 of 2014 - K
               ======================
          Dated this the 30th day of September, 2015

                          J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are aggrieved with the fact that the Water Authority has not reported the vacancies of Fitter available in the authority. The petitioner's contention revolves on the ground that by Ext.P6, it has been informed to the petitioner that there are 127 vacancies of Fitter of which 21 are designated as Head Fitters and the balance 106 designated as Fitters.

2. The petitioner seeks that vacancies existing in the Water Authority taking the sanctioned strength as 127, be reported. The Water Authority has filed a counter affidavit, in which it is specifically stated that the existing vacancies of Fitter including Head Fitter is 117 as is indicated at Ext.R2(a).

3. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner refuted such contention on the basis of the Office Note in Ext.P7, wherein there was a recommendation made, as to whether 10 numbers of vacancies taking the strength of as sanctioned posts 2 W.P.(C) No.20902 of 2014 - K of Fitter as 127. Going by the above Office Note, it is seen that 20 Fitters were regularized as per the Government Order, who were earlier NMR hands along with the other similar employees in different categories.

4. The specific contention taken up in the Note is that, the entire regularization so made was by sanctioning of new posts and 10 number of Fitters, who were regularized were accommodated in the vacancies available. It was only in such circumstance that the sanctioned post came down to 117 was the ground on which there was a request made for reporting 10 further vacancies.

5. However, this Court cannot go by an Office Note, which has not been approved. Further what stands against the petitioner is the specific finding as recorded in Ext.R2(a), wherein it has been stated that there are only 117 vacancies sanctioned.

6. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would contend that 21 Fitters are available in the Water Authority, 3 W.P.(C) No.20902 of 2014 - K which; looking at the ratio of 5:1 require 105 persons in the Fitter category. The mere fact that there were more persons designated as Head Fitters even in excess of the ratio, would not accrue any right on the rank holder to seek for reporting of vacancies in accordance with the ratio, when what is relevant is the sanction itself.

7. In such circumstance, this Court is of the opinion that no relief can be granted to the petitioner and it is also stated that the rank list expires today. In such circumstance if at all any vacancies exist as on today, the Water Authority shall report the same immediately.

The writ petition would stand dismissed with the above observations.

Sd/-

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/30 /09/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.