Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Satish Kumar Huf, New Delhi vs Ito, Ward-38(4), New Delhi on 10 February, 2021

              IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                    DELHI "C" BENCH: NEW DELHI

                    (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

          BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND
              SHRI K.N.CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                        ITA No.2553/Del/2019
                      Assessment Year : 2014-15
     Satish Kumar HUF,                      ITO,
     2011, Railway Road, Narela,        Vs Ward-38(4),
     New Delhi-110040.                      New Delhi.
     PAN-AAQHS5749L
     APPELLANT                              RESPONDENT
     Appellant by                        Ms. Manshi Jain, CA
     Respondent by                       Sh.M.Baranwal, Sr.DR
     Date of Hearing                             10.02.2021
     Date of Pronouncement                       10.02.2021



                                ORDER

PER G.S. PANNU, VP :

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-13, New Delhi dated 25.01.2019.

2. The assessee, vide its letter dated 05.01.2021, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by her and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020".

3. Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

4. However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

5. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing in the presence of both the parties on 10th February, 2021.

      Sd/-                                                            Sd/-


(K.N.CHARY)                                                     (G.S. PANNU)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                                             VICE PRESIDENT

* Amit Kumar *
Copy forwarded to:
   1. Appellant
   2. Respondent
   3. CIT
   4. CIT(Appeals)
   5. DR: ITAT

                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                                       ITAT, NEW DELHI