Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Balbir Singh vs Dtc, Gnct Delhi on 20 May, 2011

                  CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                      Club Building (Near Post Office)
                    Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                           Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/000687/12447
                                                        Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/000687

Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant                             :      Mr. Balbir Singh
                                             H No 82 Sultanpur Colony
                                             Meharauli
                                             Delhi - 110030

Respondent                            :      Ms. Renu Popli

PIO & Sr. Manager (P&SO) Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), Govt. of NCT of Delhi O/o the PIO, BBM Complex Delhi 110009 RTI application filed on : 06/10/2010 PIO replied on : 01/02/2011 First Appeal filed on : 22/11/2010 First Appellate Authority order of : 31/12/2010 Second Appeal received on : 11/03/2011 Information Sought:

The Appellant through 08 queries had sought reasons and file notings available in various files.
PIO`s Reply:
The PIO provided photocopies of the files asked under Q 1 & 2. As Q 3 to 8 did not pertain to his department, no answer was given.
Grounds for the First Appeal:
The reply was unsatisfactory and incomplete.
Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA): The applicant was granted permission to access the files relevant to the reply within ten days of receipt of the order. Regarding Q.No 3 to 8 the DM (PLD IV & V) was directed to send the reply within ten days.
Ground of the Second Appeal:
The appellant is not satisfied with the information provided.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present Appellant: Mr. Balbir Singh Respondent: Ms. Renu Popli, PIO & Sr. Manager (P&SO);
The PIO has provided an inspection of the relevant records and also information that on query-03 to 08 not action has been taken. The Appellant has certain grievances that the pay commission recommendations have not been properly followed by DTC. This Commission has not jurisdiction in this matter. Decision:
The Appeal is disposed.
The information available on the records has been provided. This decision is announced in open chamber. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties. Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Shailesh Gandhi Information Commissioner 20 May 2011 (In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)