Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Brinda Devi vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 10 January, 2013

Author: Aparesh Kumar Singh

Bench: Aparesh Kumar Singh

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                           W.P. (C) No. 1544 of 2008
                                       ---
        Brinda Devi                        ---  ---  ----      Petitioner
                                    Versus
        The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary,
        Road Construction Department & others        ---  --- Respondents
                                       ---
        CORAM:      The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
        For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
        For the State:      JC to SC (L&C)
                                       ---
05/ 10.01.2013

Heard counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner had come before this court being aggrieved by the acts of the respondent no. 7 who was said to have encroached illegally upon the land of the National Highway No. 31 at Plot No. 6425, Khata No. 727, Ward No. 2, Jhumri Telaiya and thereby blocking the ingress and outgress of the petitioner in collusion with the official respondents.

3. After the order passed on 4th February 2010 in the instant case, the respondent no. 6-Executive Engineer, NH Wing, NH Division, Hazaribagh filed an affidavit wherein it has been stated that the alleged encroachment has been removed and copy of the letter of communication addressed to the Executive Engineer dated 17th March 2010 has been annexed as annexure-B and a letter dated 17.03.2010 addressed to the Sub Divisional Officer, Koderma has also been annexed as annexure-C showing compliance.

4. No rejoinder to the said affidavit has been filed, although removal of the entire encroachment has been disputed by the petitioner.

5. However, from the facts which have been brought on record by way of supplementary counter affidavit, it appears that the alleged encroachment has been removed and it has not been refuted by filing any rejoinder or bringing any material on record. It appears that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed.

(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/