Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs Narendra Kumar Prajapat on 12 December, 2023

Bench: Abhay S. Oka, Dipankar Datta

     ITEM NO.21                                    COURT NO.8                    SECTION XIV

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 47322/2023

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-05-2023
     in EFA (COMM) No. 3/2023 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New
     Delhi)

     KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED                                                  Petitioner(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     NARENDRA KUMAR PRAJAPAT                                                      Respondent(s)

     (IA No.245229/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA
     No.245230/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

     Date : 12-12-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

     For Petitioner(s)
                                             Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv.
                                             Mr. V. Seshagiri, Adv.
                                             Mr. Bikram Bhattacharya, Adv.
                                             Mrs. Bela Maheshwari, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner.

Delay condoned.

From paragraph 6 of the impugned order, it appears to be an admitted position that the Arbitrator unilaterally appointed by the petitioner was ineligible Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2023.12.14 to be appointed as an arbitrator by virtue of Section 09:58:33 IST Reason: 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 1 Hence, in view of this peculiar factual position, no case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.

Pending application also stands disposed of.

(ANITA MALHOTRA)                                       (AVGV RAMU)
   AR-CUM-PS                                          COURT MASTER




                                     2