Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Gujarat High Court

State Of Gujarat vs Shandong Tiejun Electric Power ... on 4 September, 2015

Author: Harsha Devani

Bench: Harsha Devani, A.G.Uraizee

                  O/OJCA/528/2015                                            ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) NO. 528 of 2015

                            In STAMP NUMBER NO. 1790 of 2015

         ================================================================
                        STATE OF GUJARAT....Applicant(s)
                                     Versus
            SHANDONG TIEJUN ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING COMPANY
                              LTD....Respondent(s)
         ================================================================
         Appearance:
         MS MAITHILI MEHTA, ASSTT. GOVT PLEADER for the Applicant
         UCHIT N SHETH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ================================================================

                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI
                        and
                        HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE

                                    Date : 04/09/2015


                                     ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 49 days caused in filing Tax Appeal (Stamp) No.1790 of 2015, wherein the order dated 19.02.2015 passed by the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal in Second Appeal No.358 of 2014 is subject matter of challenge.

2. Heard Ms. Maithili Mehta, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the applicant and Mr. Uchit Sheth, learned advocate for the respondent.




                                         Page 1 of 2

HC-NIC                                Page 1 of 2      Created On Mon Sep 07 05:55:49 IST 2015
                       O/OJCA/528/2015                                             ORDER




3. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties and more particularly, the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the appeal has been sufficiently explained.

4. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the tax appeal is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.

(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (A.G.URAIZEE,J) parmar* Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Mon Sep 07 05:55:49 IST 2015