Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Jeet Bahadur @ Dhunni on 1 July, 2016

Bench: S.A. Bobde, Ashok Bhushan

               ITEM NO.25                       COURT NO.13                   SECTION II

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

               Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)......of 2016
                                     CRLMP No. 9430/2016

               (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated
               02/07/2015 in CRLA No. 500/1995 passed by the High Court Of
               Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)

               STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                       VERSUS

               JEET BAHADUR @ DHUNNI & ANR.                                  Respondent(s)

               (With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP)

               Date :01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

               CORAM :
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

               For Petitioner(s)            Mr. Mukul Singh, Adv.
                                            for Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.

               For Respondent(s)


                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Delay condoned.

We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petition is dismissed.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by

[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] CHARANJEET KAUR Date: 2016.07.01 17:05:47 IST A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master Reason: