Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Union Of India vs Pramod Kumar Agrawal 26 Fam/34/2017 ... on 27 November, 2019

Author: P. Sam Koshy

Bench: P. Sam Koshy

                                               -1-


                                                                                       NAFR
                       HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
                                 Writ Petition (C) No. 4315 of 2019

           1. Union of India Through Executive Engineer, Public Works Department,
              National Highway, Division Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                          ---Petitioner(s)
                                             Versus
           1. Pramod Kumar Agrawal S/o Natthulal Agrawal R/o Surajpur, Tehsil and
              District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.
           2. Land Acquisition Officer/Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Surajpur,
              District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.
           3. Additional Commissioner Surguja, Division Ambikapur, District- Surguja,
              Chhattisgarh.
                                                                         ---Respondents

For Petitioner : Shri Vaibhav P. Shukla, Advocate, on behalf of Shri B. Gopa Kumar, ASG.

For State : Shri Somkant Verma, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27.11.2019

1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 30.06.2018 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Surguja Division, Ambikapur, acting as an Arbitrator.

2. Perusal of record would show that the writ petition has been filed almost after 1 and ½ years from the date the award has been passed by the Arbitrator. No plausible explanation has been provided by the petitioner for the delay caused in filing of the writ petition or for challenging the impugned order. Perusal of certified copy of the award impugned would reveal that the petitioner had obtained a copy of the award also immediately on his applying for the same in the year, 2018 itself.

3. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of delay laches.

Sd/-

(P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder