Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Pg (Mousumi Mondal vs State Of West Bengal & Ors.) on 4 April, 2014

Author: Dipankar Datta

Bench: Dipankar Datta

                                   1



46   04.04.2014              W.P.10059(W) of 2014
pg                (Mousumi Mondal vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.)


                  Mr. Joydeep Acharya
                  Ms. Saheli Mukherjee......for the petitioner

                  Mr. Asit Datta
                  Mr. Debabrata Mondal.....for the State


                               It is claimed on behalf of the petitioner that

                  after registration of Nandigram Police Station Case No. 94

                  of 2014 dated March 12, 2014 under Sections 341/325/

                  379/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code on the basis of her

                  complaint, no investigation is being conducted and that

                  the accused persons have been constantly threatening

                  her with dire consequences and for withdrawal of such

                  complaint.

                               Mr. Acharya, learned advocate appearing for

                  the petitioner submits that the matter was brought to the

                  notice of the Superintendent of Police, Purba Medinipur

                  by a representation dated March 25, 2014, yet, there has

                  been no improvement in the situation. Accordingly, he

                  prays for appropriate orders on the police authorities to

                  ensure safety and security of the petitioner and her

                  family members.

                               Instructions furnished to Mr. Datta, learned

                  advocate for the official respondents by the Officer-in-

Charge, Nandigram Police Station reveals that none of the accused has been arrested since reportedly they have fled away just after the occurrence. However, the allegation of 2 threats received by the petitioner has not been found to be proved and that all probable sources have been engaged to trace out the whereabouts of the absconding accused.

Having heard learned advocates appearing for the parties, I direct the Superintendent of Police, Purba Medinipur to ensure the safety and security of the petitioner and her family members by making appropriate directions, as he considers fit and proper in the circumstances according to the wise exercise of his discretion.

The officer-in-charge shall continue his efforts to arrest the absconding accused for the purpose of bringing them to book.

A report shall be filed by the Officer-in- Charge, Nandigram Police Station on May 07, 2014 reporting developments in investigation in the meanwhile, when the writ petition shall be listed under the heading 'To Be Mentioned'.

(DIPANKAR DATTA,J.)