Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

National Consumer Disputes Redressal

M/S Cargo Tarpaulin Industries vs Sri Mallikarjun B. Kori on 5 July, 2007

  
 
 
 
 
 
 NCDRC
  
 
 







 



 



 
   
   
   

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES
  REDRESSAL COMMISSION 
  
 
  
   
   

  NEW DELHI 
  
 
  
   
   

REVISION PETITION NO.
   2132   OF  2007 
  
 
  
   
   

(Against
  the order dated  18/01/2007 
  
   
   

in Appeal/ Complaint No. 1773/2006 
  
 
  
   
   

      of
  the State Commission  
  
   
   

    Bangalore )  
  
 
  
   
   

M/S CARGO TARPAULIN INDUSTRIES 
  
   
   

........
  Petitioner(s)  
  
 
  
   
   

Vs. 
  
   
   

  
  
 
  
   
   

SRI MALLIKARJUN
  B. KORI 
  
   
   

........
  Respondent(s)  
  
 
  
   
   

 BEFORE: 
  
   
   

  
  
 
  
   
   

               HON'BLE
  MR. JUSTICE S.N. KAPOOR, PRESIDING MEMBER 
  
 
  
   
   

               MR.
  B.K. TAIMNI, MEMBER 
   

  
  
 
  
   
   

For the Petitioner
                  :
  NEMO 
  
 
  
   
   

  
  
 
  
   
   

 Dated the 5th Day of
  July, 2007 
  
 
  
   
   

 ORDER 
 

The case was called out earlier and passed over. Again even on second call, none is present on behalf of the petitioner.

We have gong through the impugned order. It is apparent that the petitioner has charged Rs.112/- for Duck Back Baby Sheet sold to the complainant. Its Maximum Retail Price was Rs.90/-. According to the petitioner that though M.R.P was Rs.124/- but the Duck Back Baby Sheet was having an old label of Rs.92/- and after discussions, the price was settled at Rs.112/-. If there was an old label on the Duck Back Baby Sheet, indicating M.R.P. of Rs.92/- its M.R.P. would not increase, if subsequently due to increased cost of production, transportation etc. M.R.P. of subsequently manufactured goods is increased. If in these circumstances, the State Commission has imposed exemplary compensation of Rs.10,000/-, we think that the order passed by the State Commission does not call for any interference.

Revision petition is dismissed accordingly.

...J (S.N. KAPOOR)  PRESIDING MEMBER     ...

(B.K. TAIMNI) MEMBER SS/10