Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Manish Gulati vs Union Of India And Ors on 6 April, 2022

Author: Manmohan

Bench: Manmohan, Dinesh Kumar Sharma

                          $~24 to 26
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          24
                          +    W.P.(C) 7456/2019, CM APPL. 31053/2019
                               MANISH GULATI                               ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Mr. P. K. Sharma and Ms. Somya
                                                          Goel, Advocates.
                                                versus

                               UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.                   ..... Respondents
                                             Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms.
                                                       Priya Singh, Advocates.

                          25
                          +    W.P.(C) 7457/2019, CM APPL. 31055/2019
                               SHASHI GULATI                               ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Mr. P. K. Sharma and Ms. Somya
                                                          Goel, Advocates.

                                               versus

                               UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.                   ..... Respondents
                                             Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms.
                                                       Priya Singh, Advocates

                          26
                          +    W.P.(C) 7680/2019, CM APPL. 31939/2019, CM APPL. 11113/2020
                               TARUN GULATI                                 ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Mr. P. K. Sharma and Ms. Somya
                                                          Goel, Advocates.

                                               versus


                               UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.                   ..... Respondents
                                             Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms.
                                                       Shreya Jetly, Advocate for R-1/UOI.


Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KRISHNA BHOJ
Signing Date:07.04.2022
17:34:50
                                                                   Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC, GNCTD
                                                                  with Mr. Hafsa and Mr. Shourya
                                                                  Dasgupta, Advocates for R-2.


                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
                                                    ORDER

% 06.04.2022 Present writ petitions have been filed primarily challenging the legality and validity of Sections 16 and 17 of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that according to the said provision, only the parents and senior citizens have the right to file an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. He submits that the said provision is arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.

A learned Single Judge of this Court in Sudesh Chhikara Vs. State (Govt. Of NCT of Delhi) and Ors., WP(C) 11703/2018 has already held that any of the affected parties can file an appeal.

This court is of the opinion that as it has already been held that any aggrieved party can file an appeal, the issue of law raised in the present writ petitions is academic.

Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file appeals to the Appellate Tribunal.

Learned counsel for the petitioners assures and undertakes to this Court that the appeals shall be filed within three weeks from today. The assurance/undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioners is Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KRISHNA BHOJ Signing Date:07.04.2022 17:34:50 accepted by this Court and the petitioners are held bound by the same.

This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. Rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. Needless to state that till the appeals are taken up for hearing, no further coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners.

MANMOHAN, J DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J APRIL 6, 2022 TS Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KRISHNA BHOJ Signing Date:07.04.2022 17:34:50