Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Tap Robinson vs State Of Arunachal Pradesh on 12 January, 2026

Author: Pankaj Mithal

Bench: Pankaj Mithal

     ITEM NO.50                                COURT NO.8                 SECTION II

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F         I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL)……………………... Diary No. 9011/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-05-2020
     in CRA No. 03/2018 passed by the Gauhati High Court at Itanagar]

     TAP ROBINSON                                                          Petitioner(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH                                            Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 84027/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE SPARE
     COPIES; IA No. 59648/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE
     IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

     Date : 12-01-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

     For Petitioner(s)                 Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, AOR
                                       Mr. Siddhant Awasthy, Adv.
                                       Mr. Siddhant Saroha, Adv.
                                       Mr. Aniket Kumar Parcha, Adv.
                                       Mr. Kushal Rana, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                 Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

1. Learned counsel for the State of Arunachal Pradesh prays for and is allowed two weeks’ time to take instructions, if there is any remission policy in vogue in the state and whether the petitioner has requested for remission to the Warden or the Jail Superintendent and the timeframe within which had the State would take to consider the Signature Not Verified application.

Digitally signed by SNEHA DAS Date: 2026.01.12

2. List after two weeks.

19:31:41 IST Reason:

          (SNEHA DAS)                                                    (NIDHI MATHUR)
     SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                                          COURT MASTER (NSH)