Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

M/S. Shree Cement Ltd vs Cce, Jaipur on 7 January, 2008

        

 
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, R.K. PURAM, W.B. NO.2, PRINCIPAL BENCH
NEW DELHI,  COURT NO. III

Excise Appeal No.1151 of  2006-SM (BR)

 [Arising out of order in appeal No.30(HKS)CE/JPR-II/2006 dated 6.1.2006  passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Jaipur (Rajasthan)]
                                  
                                                                    Date of Hearing/ Decision: 7.1.2008	

For approval and signature:

Hon'ble Mr. P.K. Das, Member (Judicial)

1. Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see		:
     the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the 
    CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.

2. Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the		: 
    CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication
     in any authoritative report or not? 

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy	  	:
    of the Order?

4. Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental 	:
    authorities?


M/s. Shree Cement Ltd.							    Appellants
[Rep. by Mr. Abhishek Rao, Advocate]

Vs.

CCE, Jaipur 		 Respondent

[Rep. by Mr. S. Gautam, Authorized Representative (DR) CORAM: Mr. P.K. Das, Member (Judicial) O R D E R NO../Dated:7.1.2008 Per P.K. Das:

Heard both sides and perused the records.

2. The appellant filed this appeal against denial of credit on Linear Plates, Blow Bars, Jointing Sheets and Resistance Plate. It is seen that the credit was denied on Linear Plates and Blow Bars on the ground that these goods have been used in the mines. The Commissioner (Appeals) denied credit following the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Jaypee Rewa Cement reported in 2004 (133) ELT 3 (SC). I find that the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Vikram Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2006 (194) EL T 3 (SC) = 2006 (197) ELT 145 (SC) held that the capital goods used in mines are eligible for Cenvat credit, if the mines are captive mines so that they constitute one integrated unit together with the concerned cement factory. It has been held that explosives, lubricating oil ,etc. used in the mines entitled to Cenvat credit. In view of that it is required to examine as to whether these items were used as capital goods in captive mines.

3. Regarding denial of credit on Steam Jointing Sheet and Resistance Plates, it is seen that the authorities below had not discussed use of these items and the case laws cited by the ld. Advocate.

4. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the adjudicating authority to examine the admissibility of the credit on these items in the light of the decision of the Honble Supreme Court and the use of these items. Needless to say that the adjudication authority shall provide proper opportunity of hearing before deciding the appeal. The appeal is allowed by way of remand.

(Order dictated & pronounced in open court on 7.1.2008).

( P.K. Das ) Member (Judicial) Ckp.