Karnataka High Court
All India Railway Catering Contractors ... vs Union Of India on 13 July, 2012
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
Bench: Ajit J Gunjal
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2012
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL
W.P.NO.23617 OF 2012 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN
ALL INDIA RAILWAY CATERING
CONTRACTORS AND WORKERS ASSOCIATION
[REGISTERED]
NO.187/C, M.G.COLONY
RAILWAY QUARTERS
BANGALORE - 560 023.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.ZAMEER PASHA, ADV.)
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
RAILWAY BOARD, RAILWAY BHAVAN
NEW DELHI - 110 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE CHAIRMAN
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
RAILWAY BOARD, RAILWAY BHAVAN
NEW DELHI - 110 001
3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TOURISM AND CATERING
RAILWAY BOARD
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
RAIL BHAVAN
NEW DELHI - 110 001
4. THE DIRECTOR
TOURISM AND CATERING
2
RAILWAY BOARD
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
RAIL BHAVAN
NEW DELHI - 110 001
5. THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL
MANAGER/CATERING AND P.S,
NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY
GORAKHPUR - 273 012
UTTAR PRADESH
... RESPONDENTS
*****
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WITH A PRAYER
TO QUASH THE TENDER/QUOATATION FORM INVITED BY
THE RESPONDENT NO.5, CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER,
NORTH-EASTERN RAILWAYS, HEAD QUARTERS,
GORAKHPUR INVITED TENDER/QUOTATION FORM FOR
PROVISION OF CATERING SERVICES ON TRAIN
NO.12541/12542-GORAKHPUR TO LOKMNAYA TILAK
TERMINUS SUPERFAST EXPRESS VIDE TENDER
DOCUMENT DATED 14.6.2012 ONLY IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO CALLING OF TENDERS / QUOTATIONS FROM
ALL EXISTING PANTRY CAR LICENSEES UNDER
ANNEXURE-E.
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner is All India Railway Catering Contractors and Workers Association, which is stationed at Bangalore. Respondents 1 to 4 are at New Delhi. Respondent No.5-the Chief Commercial Manager, North-Eastern Railways, Head Quarters situated at Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. 3
2. The petitioner is questioning the tender notification. A copy of which is produced at Annexure-E, wherein certain terms and conditions are questioned by it.
3. I am of the view that the question of this Court entertaining the writ petiton does not arise inasmuch as this Court does not have the territorial jurisdiction to deal with the matter, having regard to the decision rendered by the Apex Court in the case of M/s Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd., vs. Union of India and another reported in AIR 2004 Supreme Court 2321. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail Annexures-E & F before appropriate Court.
SD/-
JUDGE SS