Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court

Chemgen Pharma International Pvt. Ltd vs Siemens Ltd on 3 June, 2013

                                 ORDER SHEET
                             ACO No. 96 of 2013
                             APO No. 40 of 2013
                             CP No. 237 of 2012
                       IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                        Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
                                ORIGINAL SIDE

                   CHEMGEN PHARMA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.
                                   Versus
                                SIEMENS LTD.

BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE

The Hon'ble JUSTICE DR. MRINAL KANTI CHAUDHURI

Date : 3rd June, 2013.



                                                                   Appearance:
                              Mr. S. Sengupta, ld. Advocate for the appellant.
                         Mr. Rajashree Dutta, ld. Advocate for the respondent.

The Court :- This application for review is delayed by 25 days. We condone the delay and take the review application on record.

Heard the parties on the application for review. The learned Counsel appearing for the review applicant would contend, the claim of the respondent was barred by laws of limitation as it was beyond 3 years' period. This point was never urged before the learned Single Judge or before us. Limitation is a mixed question of fact and law. This cannot be a ground for review. The review application fails and is hereby dismissed.

The review applicant must pay cost of this application assessed at Rs.10,000/- out of which they would 2 pay Rs.5,000/- to the respondent and balance Rs.5000/- to the State Legal Services Authority within one week from date. In default of payment of cost, the respondent would be entitled to add it to its claim.

(BANERJEE, J.) (DR. MRINAL KANTI CHAUDHURI, J.) dg/