Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai

Dcit,Corporate Circle-1,, Coimbatore vs Suguna Foods Ltd (Formerly Suguna ... on 25 October, 2018

            आयकर अपील
य अ धकरण,          'डी'  यायपीठ, चे नई

               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                          'D' BENCH, CHENNAI
                  ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन,  या यक सद य एवं
                 ी ए. मोहन अलंकामणी, लेखा सद य केसम&

        BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
        SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2239/Chny/2017
                 नधा(रण वष( / Assessment Year : 2011-12

The Deputy Commissioner of                  M/s Suguna Foods Limited
Income Tax,                           v.    (Formerly known as Suguna
Corporate Circle -1,                        Poultry Farm Limited), 5th floor,
63-A, Race Course Road,                     1057, Avinashi Road,
Coimbatore.                                 Coimbatore - 641 018.

                                            PAN : AADCS 0655 F
   (अपीलाथ,/Appellant)                       (-.यथ,/Respondent)

 अपीलाथ, क/ ओर से/Appellant by : Ms. S. Vijayaprabha, JCIT
 -.यथ, क/ ओर से/Respondent by :     Shri N. Anush Shanker, FCA
                                    Shri K.R. Vasudevan, Advocate

       सन
        ु वाई क/ तार
ख/Date of Hearing          : 25.09.2018
       घोषणा क/ तार
ख/Date of Pronouncement : 25.10.2018
                             आदे श /O R D E R

PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -1, Coimbatore, dated 29.06.17 and pertaining to assessment year 2011-12.

2 I.T.A. No.2239/Chny/17

2. The only issue arises for consideration in the appeal is with regard to claim of deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').

3. Ms. S. Vijayaprabha, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that the assessee claimed deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the Act in respect of poultry feed manufactured. During the year under consideration, according to the Ld. D.R., the assessee has not made any sales to the outsider / 3rd party. The entire products were used for the consumption of self and sister concern. Therefore, according to the Ld. D.R., the assessee is not eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB of the Act.

4. On the contrary, Shri N. Anush Shanker, the Ld. representative for the assessee, submitted that an identical issue came before this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for assessment year 2010-11 in I.T.A. No.1396/Mds/2015. This Tribunal found that the activity of the assessee amounts to manufacture and therefore, eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB of the Act. Moreover, according to the Ld. representative, the captive consumption is also eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB of the Act.

5. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. The eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 80-IB of the Act is not disputed. 3 I.T.A. No.2239/Chny/17 The Ld. D.R. claims that during the year under consideration, there was no sales to the third parties. The entire products manufactured by the assessee were consumed by the assessee itself. Therefore, the question arises for consideration is when the products manufactured by the assessee are consumed captively or for its own use, whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB of the Act? This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that even though the products manufactured by the assessee are consumed captively or by the assessee itself, the assessee is still eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB of the Act. Moreover, this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for assessment year 2010-11 in I.T.A. No.1396/Mds/2015, found that the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB of the Act. In view of the above, this Tribunal do not find any reason to take a different view than that of the co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal for assessment year 2010-11. Therefore, the order of the CIT(Appeals) is confirmed.

6. In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the court on 25th October, 2018 at Chennai.

             sd/-                                        sd/-
    (ए. मोहन अलंकामणी)                         (एन.आर.एस. गणेशन)
  (A. Mohan Alankamony)                         (N.R.S. Ganesan)
लेखा सद य/Accountant Member               या यक सद य/Judicial Member
चे नई/Chennai,
5दनांक/Dated, the 25th October, 2018.
                                     4               I.T.A. No.2239/Chny/17



Kri.


आदे श क/ - त6ल7प अ8े7षत/Copy to:
             1. अपीलाथ,/Appellant
             2. -.यथ,/Respondent
             3. आयकर आयु9त (अपील)/CIT(A)-1, Coimbatore
             4. Principal CIT-1, Coimbatore
             5. 7वभागीय - त न ध/DR
             6. गाड( फाईल/GF.