Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Om Prakash Daral vs State & Anr on 22 February, 2019

Author: A.K. Pathak

Bench: A.K. Pathak

$~3
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+       CRL.M.C. 221/2014
        OM PRAKASH DARAL                                 ..... Petitioner
                    Through            Mr. Ruchira V. Arora, Adv.

                          versus

        STATE & ANR.                                    ..... Respondents
                          Through      Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP
                                       Mr. Saurabh Kumar and Mr. Pramod
                                       Kumar Dubey, Advs. for respondent
                                       no. 2
        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

                          ORDER

% 22.02.2019 Crl. M.A. no. 48250/2018 (for recalling of order dt. 10.02.2017 and revival of petition) Petitioner filed present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the criminal complaint filed by respondent no. 2 against the petitioner under Sections 420/120-B/34 IPC. During the pendency of the petition, criminal complaint was dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of this, petition was disposed of as infructuous vide order dated 10th February, 2017.

It appears that respondent filed a Crl. L.P. No. 640/2016, which was allowed and complaint was restored.

Petition was disposed of as infructuous in view of dismissal of the main complaint. Since complaint has been revived, it would meet the ends of justice if this petition is also revived.

Application is allowed. CRL.M.C. no. 221/2014 is revived. CRL.M.C. 221/2014 Counsel for respondent no. 2 seeks time to file reply. Let it be filed in four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, four weeks thereafter.

Renotify on 11th July, 2019.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 22, 2019 r.bararia