Kerala High Court
Ruhaiz.T vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 5 October, 2018
Author: K.Abraham Mathew
Bench: K.Abraham Mathew
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 13TH ASWINA, 1940
Crl.MC.No. 6590 of 2018
IN CC 587/2018 of JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, NADAPURAM
CRIME NO. 669/2017 OF Nadapuram Police Station , Kozhikode
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO 1 TO 8 :-
1 RUHAIZ.T
AGED 20 YEARS
S/O KHALID,
THAYIL HOUSE, NARIPARA P.O,
KOZHIKODE
2 NAZEEMUDEN C.K,
AGED 20 YEARS
CHAMAKKALIL HOUSE, MUNNAMKAY, KAVILUMPARA.
3 JUNAID C.V.,
AGED 21 YEARS
S/O.AYUB, CHERUVETTANDE VEEDU, EYAMKODE.P.O.,
NADAPURAM.
4 SHAMANAS,
AGED 19 YEARS
S/O.KUJALI, MAMUNDERI HOUSE, PUYLIYAVU,
HARAKKADAVU.P.O.
5 MUHAMMAD MISS HAB,
AGED 1 YEARS
S/O.SUPPIHAJI, THYVECHAMADA VALIYIL HOUSE,
BHUMIVATHUKKAL, KUYITHERI.
6 SHAFI P.K.,
AGED 18 YEARS
S/O.SULLIMAN, KUTHIYI HOUSE, KODIKKARA.P.O.,
VELLIYODE, VANIMEL.
7 ASHIK C.K.,
AGED 1 YEARS
LULU MANZIL HOUSE, KUNIGADU.P.O., PURAMERI.
Crl.MC.No. 6590 of 2018
2
8 SAIDU V.T.K,
AGED 21 YEARS
S/O.SUPPI, VATTAKADU, THAZHAKURI HOUSE, KAKKATHIL,
KULANGARATH.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH
RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :-
1 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
NADAPURAM POLICE STATION,KOZHIKODE-675001
2 MOHAMMED SHINAS E
S/O MOIDU, AGED 21 YEARS, EDAVALANTAVIDE HOUSE,
NADAPURAM, KOZHIKODE - 675001.
BY ADV. SRI.V.VINAR
R1 BY SRI. C.S . HRITHWIK SR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Petition filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. 2. Petitioners are accused in C.C.No. 587 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nadapuram registered for the offences under Sections 143, 147 and 341 r/w section 149 IPC and section 4 of the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging Act. The 2nd respondent is the victim. It is submitted that the matter has been settled and the proceedings in the trial court may be quashed. Crl.MC.No. 6590 of 2018 3
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and second respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. I have perused the affidavit filed by the second respondent, who has entered appearance through counsel. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer of the petitioners.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in C.C.No. 587 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nadapuram are quashed.
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE SMA Crl.MC.No. 6590 of 2018 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S ANNEXURES :-
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.669/2017 FILED BY 1ST RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED BY 1ST RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A3 AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :- NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE SMA