Karnataka High Court
Shri Vasantsa S/O Rajansa Habib vs Shri Basappa S/O Mallappa Halakati on 28 June, 2012
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
Bench: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
Dated th.s the 28 day of June 2O1
Be.fc,re
THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR
Regular ec fl0 Appeal No xibd 2uuzs 'Dec Iri
BETWEEN:
Shr Vasantsa sb Raansa Habib
Age 'o years Oc trade.
RIo AIar1 No n Ka atagi aa r
G' iledgudda
;' '.a' '
By Sri Ramaknsi'na G Drongad Advo t
a
ej
AND.
I Snr' Basaix'a b: Maliaopa Haaivnt
jed Oyears ta o s db
r'Q Kiiagad' Road
NearMu haktan'i"r $ bagak'
St'ie angapoe e
F 'a 'aPp-a ra akar
\q ye s .A. •t-ri ,
n Kaiqac... F -a:
.- s. r a
: 1--' .'-
yr a,
t' .-'i' rc i'. F
,.. 1
ip.r '? fr t .f4.--I ( ' - . a Ii-.
t
":' ci
' .1' iii U
F c
c
1 .a •r.''. ' ' --r .
ii
I.
C
JUDGEMENT
I1 1' •tz di's II''IL e'fl't' spp •1'e L ' thontri nd-g )II:t 1 i hit h (ow tr o 1 '.
I ie qo tC')' h it' I• '. I Ig , did I Li .sr ' 's.. il os'ler nf fl. p,.' t_. '. H ; II \I 'Z74 -' ni W.an \' I4j!L'tt • • • I •••.• i i.'' ' I i ttii iue1'i 1 1 1 , I r I Ci i ' t r I(' 'I...' ;
o 1 h..i•' •h -t L e •' 'VI's 'I I '•_ . I I 4 ' ' 4 4 I ig'•. t, ---1 4
--. 4.'. . I.. • • 4 4. I t 'b S I • !--
I itiflt' .i ci! (IlL' ;nn"t'. I IS Sill ' •' hi ' 1 t •II'hi' ih. ' \1 ii' i H k v. ' ) 06 I Ji t S 11%? 1 ca. 11 . t.r._,. S ;i PIflftrt ir 4 t W ot hiii tpa 11.1: 4 IttI tr"ou,...I' c Ic. I S,na fleet' n 04 (R1U3t) Ih'a' 'liii tj.-pa H uakaV oc' 4 re t abs'1iwosner flu ad , pt.r urdc. t.S I IX d d 0.1 0j flO () in t .K It of id 1' of t u e .'... c,j flu e\cnI ø 5 'n.j n' F 'r I IS 'Sc' V'J. is' ire' ) ' t'S% I. \n'n e' cc 1 in \Ia:1-tp 'a P l.k It.
4 •i t't 'I )' t'•k. I
Eu o . iIath 1 I 1
R t
Ii' ' iF F
c.inlan trca._h ._itc_d. it 'Xt .la;cI_L.e ('3
's'tt' SdI r)ccc; .tL 1 ' t i rnc I eal-- hid? :i, ' -- I
• itt? "t !" a I • •
• i I .
*1 -- • r Ij
4
-' (it_I
. *.I, • ' .1 •f••- . . a: ,.' . •0
I I. I
'
1 t . •
(.
4
r" 1'1 ' ) 'IJIIti P4 IhhI•).is 3!. M':eLl a. '%u •!•.
. ':'nit1 .1.
(..i it.t • hI"
'i '.
Ii. I,-- I
1'
a
.1
antin•ttd .It ot tS 1
r . ..t z"e
i he ntne C IS no fli d'u'n'eU rbr :'e
lippe' Ki'clip T'ioj si.. md oi at r .1 'r • "
p,..ss II.. lit n aid Iv ( epba? flJ U an a .-ae 'cL.
lie tc. 'Dz i i'tls nd u t!heI ..3 I
iheit it oft d .'ard ' r
fl (p9 It I t I a"d ..1_;u!..ttn. \t L •l1I%i.t1 '
1 e ,
• •'
• ;'pr i. d' ( • • ( '•' ' 11 •L'e ".,t' t II '•
•
hcr',' a • %
I i I
S I
t C Is: IS T •t• •
S t.. t. I. •
1• •r . •
a • •-- • ;' c
I t.:t •
I_ "II . I t
• • •..•.
"b•
•
1
hL' dzn'I •nt t' c_,I '
i'l' •t 'A
aI. --:rtId ) 'arn' th
i or i ' %peI'' e iea nt'i.1
I_b t-
s
1 ..
j,. 1• i'. '01 tLi' %t • :.' ti's
i air k )1 tb... prt ix" iii. U •
*bS(fl _Ii 't''u
d "n 'UT Pt isaac F C Li p1 intitIs a' 'el1 t1
.
1 . letenc' mb 10 their ts,'e a Sg i 1 c '1' t e 1 i '( o I i 0' 1' ts.aid b. .Ktuaf 'uhJ%ct rnttei I th prüpeii ' h '.LI p1 .i'itil . d delt.nda 1 .u .11 1ttI, :'i' 1d I ' e i' '(1 •I. U .rene is' a I 1 cJ t''r No question of law much less an substa ntial qnetion of law arises in this appeal. 1It t .!.
pv' . i a. •. 1)1(1 I, i 31 fflt ci 'SiLl" I I '.e'I , 14.,i ' ZI. 1 1 ('1 'u.' ' " L't I tI si., ..
In.-
I
4 1' ' C.
Iii) I .
• I..'
a
r