Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Sentinel Clothing Company vs M/S.Cargomar (Private) Ltd on 7 December, 2023

                                                                     Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.238 of 2018

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 07.12.2023

                                                   CORAM:


                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

                                       Rev. Aplc (MD) Nos.238 to 241 of 2017
                                  in CRP(MD) Nos.992/2013 and 801 to 803 /20114

                     1.M/s.Sentinel Clothing company
                       No.10, 2nd street, Tirupur 641 604
                       represented by its Parner V.S.Chandirakumar

                     2.V.S.Chandirakumar

                     3.S.Rukmani                               ...      Petitioners/Petitioners
                                                                        in all review
                                                                        applications

                                                        v.


                     M/s.Cargomar (Private) Ltd.,
                     36/1 2nd street, Muniaswamypuram
                     Kamaraj Salai
                     Tuticorin 3.
                     rep. by Mr.N.Harikrishnan
                     Senior Executive Accountant               ...      Respondent/appellant
                                                                        in all review
                                                                        applications


                     PRAYER: Review Applications are filed under Section 114 and Order 47

                     Rule 1 of C.P.C. to review the order made in CRP Nos.992 of 2013 and

                     1/3
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                       Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.238 of 2018

                     801 to 803 of 2014 dated 23.06.2015.

                                           For Petitioners   : Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan
                                           For Respondents : No appearance


                                                  COMMON ORDER


When the review applications were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the review petitioners would submit that nothing survives for consideration in the review applications.

2. Recording the said submission, these review applications are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.




                                                                           07.12.2023
                     NCC           : Yes/No
                     Index         : Yes/No
                     RR




                     2/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.238 of 2018 P.B.BALAJI, J.

RR Rev.Aplc (MD) Nos.238 to 241 of 2018 07.12.2023 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis