Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Jitendra Varma vs State Of U.P. on 18 February, 2021

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021 ALL 144

Author: Subhash Chand

Bench: Subhash Chand





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 86
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10747 of 2021
 

 
Applicant :- Jitendra Varma
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Subhash Chand,J.
 

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record of the present bail application.

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant Jitendra Varma with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 644 of 2020, under Sections 411, 413, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Karvi, District Chitrakoot.

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that co-accused Ram Raj Ahirwar having similar role to that of applicant has already granted bail by this Court vide order dated 12.2.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7819 of 2021, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has not previous criminal history, he is not likely to abscond.

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant but conceded on point of parity.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, let the applicant Jitendra Varma involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, liberty may be given to the trial court to cancel the bail without any reference to this Court.

Order Date :- 18.2.2021 PS