Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Pravin Dhirubhai Mehta vs Special Land Acquisition Officer / ... on 4 October, 2018

Author: R.Subhash Reddy

Bench: R.Subhash Reddy, Vipul M. Pancholi

        C/SCA/9196/2018                            ORDER




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

          R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9196 of 2018
                             With
          R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9197 of 2018
                             With
          R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9198 of 2018
                             With
          R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9199 of 2018
                             With
          R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9864 of 2018
==========================================================
                   PRAVIN DHIRUBHAI MEHTA
                            Versus
        SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER / COLLECTOR
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AJ YAGNIK(1372) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,3
MR DEVANG VYAS(2794) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 5
MR RAMNANDAN SINGH(1126) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 6
MS ARCHANA U AMIN(2462) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2
NOTICE SERVED(4) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 4
==========================================================
 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY
          and
          HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
                      Date : 04/10/2018
                   COMMON ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY) In this batch of five Special Civil Applications  under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the  acquisition   of   land   for   the   purpose   of   Mumbai  Ahmedabad   High   Speed   Bullet   Train   Project   is  questioned.   One   of   the   prayers   is   questioning   the  validity of Section 10A read with Section 2(1) of the  Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land  Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Gujarat  Amendment)   Act,   2016.   It   is   the   case   of   the  Page 1 of 2 C/SCA/9196/2018 ORDER petitioner   that   State   amendment   is   contrary   to   the  objects of the Central Act.

In one of the matters, on behalf of the Railway  Ministry, affidavit is filed earlier on 17.08.2018. 

Out   of   batch   of   five   cases,   learned   counsel  Mr.Monaal   Davawala   has   submitted   that   he   has  instructions   to   withdraw   Special   Civil   Application  Nos.9196/2018, 9197/2017, 9198/2018 and 9199/2018. 

In   Special   Civil   Application   No.9864   of   2018,  learned   counsel   appearing   for   the   Railway   Ministry  submits  that   earlier,   Ministry   of   Rural  Development  has   filed   affidavit   without   meeting   some   of   the  points, as such made request to grant further time to  file additional affidavit. 

In   view   of   such   developments   and   request   made,  as   a   last   chance,   the   matter   is   adjourned   to  12.10.2018. 

(R.SUBHASH REDDY, CJ) (VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J) piyush Page 2 of 2