Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 5]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ratan Lal vs Girdhar Lal on 6 November, 2008

Author: N P Gupta

Bench: N P Gupta

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
     --------------------------------------------------------


                 CIVIL RESTORATION No. 05953 of 2008

                                            RATAN LAL
                                        V/S
                                          GIRDHAR LAL

    Ms. DEEPIKA VYAS for Mr. RANJEET JOSHI, for the
appellant / petitioner

       Date of Order : 6.11.2008

                           HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.

                                    ORDER

-----

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The Registry has reported the restoration to be barred by 358 days.

In my view, the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not disclose any sufficient ground for condoning the delay. The appeal was dismissed by the Dy. Registrar consequent upon the peremptory order, and as appears from the order-sheet that counsel was present on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, the dismissal of the appeal was very much known on 6.8.2007 itself.

Thus, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is dismissed. Consequently, the restoration application is also dismissed as time barred.

( N P GUPTA ),J.

/tarun/