Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

G.Mariadass vs The District Collector on 28 August, 2019

Bench: M.Sathyanarayanan, B.Pugalendhi

                                                             1

                                BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF THE MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATE : 28.08.2019

                                                           CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
                                                        AND
                                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                               W.P. (MD) NO. 18562 OF 2019

                   G.Mariadass                                             .. Petitioner

                                                           - Vs -

                   1. The District Collector
                      Collectorate, Pudukottai District.

                   2. The Revenue Divisional Officer
                      Illupur, Pudukottai District.

                   3. The Tahsildar
                      Illupur Taluk, Illupur
                      Pudukottai District.

                   4. Edison
                   5. Arockiaraj
                   6. Savariraj
                   7. Arulprakasam
                   8. Elizabeth                                            .. Respondents


                            Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying

                   this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to

                   remove the encroachment made by respondent Nos. 4 to 8 in Survey No.383/1 to


                       ___________
http://www.judis.nic.in
                       W.P. No.18562/2019
                                                             2

                   an extent of 82 feet length 10 feet width pathway with immediate effect without

                   any delay.

                                     For Petitioner    : Mr. M.Maran


                                                          ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.Sathyanarayanan, J.) After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, made a endorsement for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to work out his remedy before the competent forum. In the light of the endorsement made, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the petitioner, if so advised and if it is available to him in law, is always at liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law before the competent forum.

2. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above observation.

                                                                           (M.S.N.J.)     (B.P.J.)
                                                                                28.08.2019
                   Index       : Yes / No
                   Internet : Yes / No
                   GLN



                       ___________
http://www.judis.nic.in
                       W.P. No.18562/2019
                                            3

                                                 M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.
                                                          AND
                                                     B.PUGALENDHI, J.



                                                                      GLN




                                                W.P. (MD) NO. 18562 OF 2019




                                                       28.08.2019




                       ___________
http://www.judis.nic.in
                       W.P. No.18562/2019