Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Shri Baldev Kumar And Another vs State Of Hp And Others on 12 July, 2016

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA.

                                                              CWP No. 3739 of 2015.
                                                     Date of decision: 12th July, 2016.

                   Shri Baldev Kumar and another                           .....Petitioners




                                                                                       .
                                      Versus





                   State of HP and others                              ..... Respondents.

           Coram:





           The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice
           The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.

           Whether approved for reporting ?1




                                                            of
           For the petitioners:                      Mr. Pankaj Thakur, proxy Advocate.
           For the respondents:                      Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General
                                    rt               with Mr. Anup Rattan and Mr.
                                                     Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate
                                                     Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma,
                                                     Deputy   Advocate      General for

                                                     respondents No. 1 to 3.
                                                     Mr. Ashwani Negi, proxy Advocate, for
                                                     respondent No.4.

           Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)

Subject matter of this writ petition is order dated 3.7.2015 annexure P1. By efflux of time this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as such alongwith pending applications. However, the petitioners are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy, if still aggrieved.

(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice.

July 12, 2016. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (cm Thakur) Judge.

1

Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:47:44 :::HCHP