Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Vimal Kumar vs The District Collector on 22 August, 2024

Author: D.Krishnakumar

Bench: D.Krishnakumar

                                                                         W.P.No.24001 of 2024



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED:    22.08.2024

                                                         CORAM :

                             THE HON'BLE MR.D.KRISHNAKUMAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                           AND
                                        THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI


                                                  W.P.No.24001 of 2024

                     S.Vimal Kumar                                        .. Petitioner
                                                           Vs

                     1.The District Collector,
                       Thiruvannamalai District.

                     2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                       Thiruvannamalai.

                     3.The Tahsildar,
                       Thiruvannamalai.

                     4.The Superintending Engineer,
                       Thiruvannamalai.

                     5.The Divisional Engineer,
                       Highways Department,
                       Thiruvannamalai.

                     6.Karthikeyan
                     7.Saravanan
                     8.Shanmugam
                     9.Selvam
                     10.Uma
                     11.Saravanan
                     12.Raja
                     13.Mariyalakshmi

                     __________
                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                W.P.No.24001 of 2024



                     14.Nagappa Chettiar
                     15.Radhakrishnan
                     16.Ezhumalai
                     17.Raja
                     18.Sarveswaran
                     19.Rajendhran
                     20.Raji
                     21.Saroja                                                    .. Respondents


                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to
                     5 to remove the encroachment made in the highways land situated at
                     Vettavalam Road, Thiruvannamalai Town and District by respondents 6
                     to 21.


                                      For the Petitioner        : Mr.R.Sreedhar

                                      For the Respondents       : Mr.T.K.Saravanan
                                                                  Government Advocate
                                                                  for respondents 1 to 5


                                                            ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachments made by respondents 6 to 21 on the highways land situated at Vettavalam Road, Thiruvannamalai Town and District. __________ Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24001 of 2024

2. The case of the petitioner is that there is a vacant land belonging to the Highways Department running to an extent of 26 feet in front of the petitioner's house, which has been encroached by respondents 6 to 21 thereby obstructing the way of petitioner's house. Further, the said encroachments lead to traffic inundation and frequent accidents on Thiruvannamalai-Vettavalam Road. The Highways Department with the help of Revenue Department and the Electricity Department removed the encroachment for the purpose of extension of road partially. Alleging that encroachments still exist, the petitioner submitted a representation on 8.2.2024 to respondents 1 to 5. The petitioner received a response from the fifth respondent that encroachment has been removed from T.S.No.243/3, New No.243/22. According to the petitioner, the encroachment has not been fully removed and the respondent authorities have not acted upon the representation of the petitioner in letter and spirit.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents filed in support of the writ petition. __________ Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24001 of 2024

4. While the petitioner states that encroachments on the land subsist, the fifth respondent vide communication dated 4.4.2024 has stated that no encroachment subsists. Therefore, there is a dispute with regard to the existence of encroachments on the said land as on date. Therefore, such disputed facts cannot be decided in this writ petition.

5. If, according to the petitioner, encroachments still subsist, he may make a fresh representation to the third respondent, enclosing all relevant documents in proof thereof, and if any such representation is received, the third respondent/Tahsildar is directed to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, after affording an opportunity to all the interested persons. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

__________ Page 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24001 of 2024 The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                  (D.K.K., ACJ.)      (P.B.B, J.)
                                                                             22.08.2024
                     Index             :     Yes/No
                     NC                :     Yes/No
                     bbr

                     To:

                     1.The District Collector,
                       Thiruvannamalai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai.

3.The Tahsildar, Thiruvannamalai.

4.The Superintending Engineer, Thiruvannamalai.

5.The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Thiruvannamalai.

__________ Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24001 of 2024 THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.B.BALAJI, J.

bbr W.P.No.24001 of 2024 22.08.2024 __________ Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis