Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

V.Thangavel vs The District Collector on 28 November, 2024

Author: P.T.Asha

Bench: P.T.Asha

                                                                          WP.No.35449 of 2024



                                    In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

                                              Dated : 28.11.2024

                                                      Coram :

                                      The Honourable Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA

                                         Writ Petition No.35449 of 2024


                V.Thangavel                                               ...Petitioner
                                                        Vs

                1.The District Collector,
                  Tiruchengode Road,
                  Namakkal District.

                2.The Tahsildar, Paramathi
                  Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.

                3.The Surveyor, Paramathi Velur
                  Taluk, Namakkal District.                               ...Respondents



                          PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying
                for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to
                survey and subdivide the cart track comprised in S.No.169/1A in
                A.Kunnathur Village, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District by
                considering the petitioner's representation dated 27.8.2024.



                                  For Petitioner  :      Mr.Senthil
                                  For Respondents :      Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP



                                                      ORDER

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5 WP.No.35449 of 2024 Seeking a Mandamus to the second respondent to consider his representation date 27.8.2024 to conduct an survey and subdivide the cart track in S.No.169/1A in A.Kunnathur Village, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District, the petitioner is before this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader accepting notice for the respondents.

3. The petitioner would contend that the petitioner's parents owned S.No.169 and other lands in A.Kunnathur Village, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District. Since the adjacent land owners disturbed the usage of water through pipeline and the pathway used by the petitioner's parents to reach the said lands, O.S.No.41 of 1976 came to be filed before the District Munsif Court, Namakkal for a declaration and permanent injunction, in which, a compromise decree was passed on 30.8.1978. By the said compromise, the petitioner's parents agreed to lay a cart track and accordingly, they also laid the cart track having 10 feet width. Till they were alive, the petitioner's parents and the adjacent land owners were utilizing the same for the past four decades without any hindrance.

4. After the demise of the petitioner's parents, the petitioner and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5 WP.No.35449 of 2024 the adjacent land owners were using the said 10 feet cart track, which is the only access to reach their respective lands. Thereafter, the said 10 feet width pathway along with the well was subdivided into S.No. 169/A out of a total extent of 0.11.50 hectares. Further, a joint patta was issued in respect of S.No.169/A. However, the said 10 feet cart track was not subdivided separately. Hence, the petitioner made an online application on 27.8.2024 seeking to conduct a survey, subdivide the cart track in S.No.169/A and to mark the details in the Field Measurement Book. He also paid the necessary fees. A representation was sent to the second respondent even on the same day. However, it did not evoke any response. Hence the writ petition.

5. The petitioner made the application to the second respondent in order to prevent hindrance for the usage of the said pathway by both the petitioner as well as the adjacent land owners in future.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is allowed and a Mandamus is issued to the second respondent to conduct survey of the said pathway in S.No.169/1A. The petitioner shall submit all the relevant records before the second respondent, who, in turn, shall, after issuing notice to the adjacent land owners and interested parties, hold an enquiry and thereafter, pass orders https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5 WP.No.35449 of 2024 either surveying and subdividing the said cart track and demarcating the boundaries or rejecting the request. In the case of rejection, a speaking order shall be passed. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

28.11.2024 To

1.The District Collector, Tiruchengode Road, Namakkal District.

2.The Tahsildar, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.

3.The Surveyor, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.

RS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5 WP.No.35449 of 2024 P.T.ASHA,J RS WP.No.35449 of 2024 28.11.2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5