Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court

Shivshankar Resources Ltd. & Ors vs Shyama Enclave Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 28 August, 2017

Author: Biswanath Somadder

Bench: Biswanath Somadder

ORDER SHEET

                           APDT No. 27 of 2017
                           GA No. 2767 of 2017
                           GA No. 2768 of 2017 with
                           CS No. 262 of 2001
                   IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                       Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
                             ORIGINAL SIDE


                      SHIVSHANKAR RESOURCES LTD. & ORS.
                                   Versus
                      SHYAMA ENCLAVE PVT. LTD. & ORS.

  BEFORE:

  The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER

  The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHA ARORA

  Date : 28th August, 2017.
                                  Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee,
                                  Mrs. Rituparna De,
                                  Ms. Micky Chowdhury,
                                  Ms. Rimpa Rajpal, Advs.
                                       ...for the appellants
                                  Mr. Joy Saha,
                                  Ms. Sulagna Mukherjee,
                                  Mr. Amalaksha Jana,
                                  Mr. Brotin Kr. Dey, Advs.
                                       ...for respondent no. 1

Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee, Mr. Kallol Guhathakurta, Mr. B.K. Singh, Mr. Dipak Kr. Chakrabarti, Advs.

...for respondent nos. 4 to 7 The Court : Affidavit of service filed in Court today on behalf of the appellants/petitioners be taken on record. 2

Perusing the same, it appears that the respondent no. 1, Shyama Enclave Pvt. Ltd., was sought to be served at the address mentioned in the cause title of the plaint. However, the postal authorities have returned the envelope with the remark "addressee cannot be located, hence insufficient address".

At the time of hearing, learned advocate representing the said respondent no. 1 namely, Shyama Enclave Pvt. Ltd. appears and is prepared to accept service. As such, the advocate-on-record for the appellants/petitioners is directed to effect service within the course of this day upon the said respondent no. 1. Similar prayer by the respondent nos. 4 to 7 is made. Let service be effected upon the said respondents by the advocate-on-record for the appellants, also in course of this day.

List this matter day after tomorrow i.e. 30th August, 2017.

(BISWANATH SOMADDER, J.) (ASHA ARORA, J.) TR/