R.Selvarani vs The Superintendent Of Police on 21 October, 2019

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Selvarani vs The Superintendent Of Police on 21 October, 2019

Bench: M.S.Ramesh

                                                                                    Crl.O.P.No.28003 of 2019

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 21.10.2019

                                                             CORAM:

                                        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

                                                 Crl.O.P.No.28003 of 2019

                      R.Selvarani                                                       ...Petitioner

                                                              Vs.


                            1. The Superintendent of Police,
                               Office of the Superintendent of Police,
                               Nagappattinam District.

                            2. The Inspector of Police,
                               Velipalayam Police Station,
                               Nagappattinam District.                                  ...Respondents


                      PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,

                      praying to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner.




                                            For petitioner          : Mr.Greetha Senthilkumar

                                            For Respondents         : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj
                                                                      Additional Public Prosecutor




                      1/6



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                              Crl.O.P.No.28003 of 2019

                                                         ORDER

It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police have been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

2. An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfettered powers of the Investigation Officers, so long as the power to investigate/enquire into these offences are legitimately exercised within the frame work of Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Though the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers the Magistrate to be a guardian in all the stages of the police investigation, there is no power envisaging him to interfere with the actual investigation or the mode of investigation.

It is in this background that numerous petitions complaining of harassment are being reported and filed before this Court seeking for directions to refrain the police officials from harassing the persons named in a complaint.

3. This Court, exercising its power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, normally would not interfere with the investigation conducted by a police officer. Nevertheless, it would also not turn a blind 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.28003 of 2019 eye to instances of harassment by the police under the guise of investigation is brought to its notice.

4. It is seen that in some cases, the investigation pending before the Police has been stayed by Court orders. It is needless to point out that in cases of this nature, the respondent Police will not be entitled to even proceed with the investigation and therefore, the petitioner may not have an apprehension of harassment in the hands of the Police.

5. In the present case in hand, the petitioner has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seek for this Court's intervention by way of a direction. The term 'harassment' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner may not be the same to the police officer.

6. In order to circumvent such situations, the following guidelines are issued:

a)While summoning any persons named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.28003 of 2019 persons through a written summon under Section 160 Cr.P.C., specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an enquiry/investigation.

b)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station.

c)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation.

d)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to.

7. With the above observations and directions, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed.

21.10.2019 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vum/hvk 4/6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.28003 of 2019 To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Nagappattinam District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Velipalayam Police Station, Nagappattinam District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

5/6

http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.28003 of 2019 M.S.RAMESH,J.

vum/hvk Crl.O.P.No.28003 of 2019 21.10.2019 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Madras High Court